Indexed in Journament

Tree physiology

ISSN 1758-4469· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
48.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #273 of 29,297 scored journals (34,026 indexed)
108 Articles
Scores higher than 99% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Tree Physiol
Abbreviated Name tree physiol
ISSN 1758-4469
URL http://treephys.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Tree physiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 85.2 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 5.7
Content Distribution 18.1 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (108)

2016
Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthetic responses are related to intensity of root severance and soil moisture conditions in the plantation tree Cunninghamia lanceolata.
Vol. 36 , No. 7 , pp. 807-17
744 views DOI Abstract
2018
Cambial phenology in Juniperus przewalskii along different altitudinal gradients in a cold and arid region.
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. 840-852
585 views DOI Abstract
2019
Incorporating non-stomatal limitation improves the performance of leaf and canopy models at high vapour pressure deficit.
489 views DOI Abstract
2020
Conifer and broadleaved trees differ in branch allometry but maintain similar functional balances.
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic differentiation in functional traits among European sessile oak populations.
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drought impacts on tree phloem: from cell-level responses to ecological significance.
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 173-191
431 views DOI Abstract
2017
Leaf acclimation to light availability supports rapid growth in tall Picea sitchensis trees.
Vol. 37 , No. 10 , pp. 1352-1366
426 views DOI Abstract
2026
Nitrogen physiology and metabolism of two contrasting Catalpa bungei genotypes in response to limited nitrogen availability
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Distribution, Development, and Function of Resin Canals in Conifers: Insights from Cellular and Genomic Perspectives
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Chromosome-level genome assembly of Tilia mandshurica reveals divergence of duplicated TPP genes associated with fructose-rich nectar formation
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Sex-specific divergence in leaf phosphorus economy in F raxinus velutina Torr. under short-term simulated nitrogen deposition
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Integrated analysis uncovers the role of circadian rhythm genes in cold adaptation of Kandelia obovata using the multi-omics data
8 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
48.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #273 of 29,297 scored
(34,026 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

48.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

85.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

18.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.