Indexed in Journament

jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering

ISSN 1006852X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,997 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
60 Articles
Scores higher than 4.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nome Abreviado jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering
Nome Abreviado jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering
ISSN 1006852X
URL http://www.daemagazine.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 0.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 42.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (60)

2016
genetic determination of high productivity in experimental hybrid combinations of sugar beet (beta vulgaris l.)
, No. 2(31) , pp. 10-15
592 views DOI Abstract
2013
response of soft winter wheat (triticum aestivum l.) to longtime enforced dormancy and time of spring vegetation recommencing
, No. 2(19) , pp. 31-35
463 views DOI Abstract
2018
Аналіз електрофоретичних спектрів зеїнів для оцінки генетичного різноманіття ліній кукурудзи (zea mays (l.) merr.)
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-96
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
obtaining plant miscanthus sacchariflorus (maxim.) hack and miscanthus sinensis andersson in vitro culture by indirect morphogenesis
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 12-19
416 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of stability and plasticity of new hybrids of maize (zea mays l.) under the conditions of polissia and steppe zones of ukraine
, No. 2(31) , pp. 16-21
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
Високоволокнистий сорт льону-довгунця ‘Есмань’
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 119-122
381 views DOI Abstract
2013
combining ability of tetraploid pollinator lines of sugar beet (beta vulgaris l. ssp. vulgaris var. altissima doell) by the elements of productivity
, No. 4(21) , pp. 44-49
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ultrasonic machining technology in dental materials
Vol. 39 , pp. 112-122
195 views DOI
2018
Аналіз електрофоретичних спектрів зеїнів для оцінки генетичного різноманіття ліній кукурудзи (zea mays (l.) merr.)
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-96
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
Високоволокнистий сорт льону-довгунця ‘Есмань’
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 119-122
381 views DOI Abstract
2017
features of formation of miscanthus giganteus planting material depending on cultivation technology elements
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 344-360
331 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficiency of foliar dressing of winter wheat
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 178-182
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
Селекційні індекси сортів пшениці ярої
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 367-372
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
specific features of selection of promising hybrids of the genus syringa for the variety testing
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 71-74
157 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,997 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.