Indexed in Journament

jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering

ISSN 1006852X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8/100
Journament Score
#12,650
Journament Rank
60
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering
Abbreviated Name jingangshi yu moliao moju gongcheng/diamond and abrasives engineering
ISSN 1006852X
URL http://www.daemagazine.com

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (60)

2016
genetic determination of high productivity in experimental hybrid combinations of sugar beet (beta vulgaris l.)
, No. 2(31) , pp. 10-15
578 views DOI Abstract
2013
response of soft winter wheat (triticum aestivum l.) to longtime enforced dormancy and time of spring vegetation recommencing
, No. 2(19) , pp. 31-35
455 views DOI Abstract
2018
Аналіз електрофоретичних спектрів зеїнів для оцінки генетичного різноманіття ліній кукурудзи (zea mays (l.) merr.)
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-96
432 views DOI Abstract
2017
obtaining plant miscanthus sacchariflorus (maxim.) hack and miscanthus sinensis andersson in vitro culture by indirect morphogenesis
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 12-19
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of stability and plasticity of new hybrids of maize (zea mays l.) under the conditions of polissia and steppe zones of ukraine
, No. 2(31) , pp. 16-21
373 views DOI Abstract
2017
Високоволокнистий сорт льону-довгунця ‘Есмань’
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 119-122
368 views DOI Abstract
2013
combining ability of tetraploid pollinator lines of sugar beet (beta vulgaris l. ssp. vulgaris var. altissima doell) by the elements of productivity
, No. 4(21) , pp. 44-49
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ultrasonic machining technology in dental materials
Vol. 39 , pp. 112-122
181 views DOI
2018
Аналіз електрофоретичних спектрів зеїнів для оцінки генетичного різноманіття ліній кукурудзи (zea mays (l.) merr.)
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-96
432 views DOI Abstract
2017
Високоволокнистий сорт льону-довгунця ‘Есмань’
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 119-122
368 views DOI Abstract
2017
features of formation of miscanthus giganteus planting material depending on cultivation technology elements
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 344-360
320 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficiency of foliar dressing of winter wheat
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 178-182
220 views DOI Abstract
2017
Селекційні індекси сортів пшениці ярої
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 367-372
131 views DOI Abstract
2017
specific features of selection of promising hybrids of the genus syringa for the variety testing
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 71-74
150 views DOI Abstract
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.