Indexed in Journament

the journal of pain : official journal of the american pain society

ISSN 1528-8447· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,688 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 5.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j pain
Abbreviated Name j pain
ISSN 1528-8447
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-pain

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.4
Innovation 34.5 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.5
Content Distribution 65.9 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Parental injustice appraisals in the context of child pain: Examining the construct and criterion validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.
Baert, F;Miller, M M;Trost, Z;Hirsh, A T;McParland, J;De Schryver, M;Vervoort, T;
394 views DOI Abstract
2015
Smaller Amygdala Volumes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Healthy Control Individuals.
Mao, Cui Ping;Yang, Hua Juan;
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 1366-1376
380 views DOI Abstract
2014
Toll-like receptor 4 signaling contributes to Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Li, Yan;Zhang, Haijun;Zhang, Hongmei;Kosturakis, Alyssa K;Jawad, Abdul Basit;Dougherty, Patrick M;
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 712-25
379 views DOI Abstract
2013
do information and communication technology access and innovation increase outsourcing in small and medium enterprises?
;María Verónica Alderete
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 303-322
318 views DOI Abstract
2010
erp in the production area: user’s opinions about
;Andre Luiz Pestana de Oliveira;Marco Antonio Pinheiro da Silveira
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 517-544
299 views Abstract
2010
an information sub-system model for the utilization of the receipt printer as a management instrument in the supermarket sector in the state of santa catarina
;Jorge Ribeiro de Toledo Filho;Paulo Roberto Elias
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 579-598
285 views DOI Abstract
2013
the forensic accounting and corporate fraud
;Joshua Onome Imoniana;Maria Thereza P Antunes;Henrique Formigoni
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 119-144
277 views DOI Abstract
2014
performance measurement of information technology governance in brazilian financial institutions
;Sara C. Boni Barbosa;Ildeberto Aparecido Rodello;Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 397-414
267 views DOI Abstract
2008
the effects of internet shoppers' trust on their purchasing intention in china
;Rong Li;Jae Jon Kim;Jae Sung Park
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 269-286
260 views DOI Abstract
2010
adoption of technological innovations in the field of health: a study on information systems in the perspective of the theory of diffusion
;Alberto de Medeiros Júnior;Moisés Ari Zilber;Ronaldo Zwicker;Gilberto Perez
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 71-94
249 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parental injustice appraisals in the context of child pain: Examining the construct and criterion validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.
Baert, F;Miller, M M;Trost, Z;Hirsh, A T;McParland, J;De Schryver, M;Vervoort, T;
394 views DOI Abstract
2015
social and organizational impacts of the electronic processing system of the brazilian superior tribunal of justice
;Christiana Soares de Freitas;Janann Joslin Medeiros
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 317-332
51 views DOI Abstract
2015
security information in production and operations: a study on audit trails in database systems
;Rodrigo Roratto;Evandro Dotto Dias
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 717-734
203 views Abstract
2015
Smaller Amygdala Volumes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Healthy Control Individuals.
Mao, Cui Ping;Yang, Hua Juan;
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 1366-1376
380 views DOI Abstract
2014
performance measurement of information technology governance in brazilian financial institutions
;Sara C. Boni Barbosa;Ildeberto Aparecido Rodello;Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 397-414
267 views DOI Abstract
2014
Toll-like receptor 4 signaling contributes to Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Li, Yan;Zhang, Haijun;Zhang, Hongmei;Kosturakis, Alyssa K;Jawad, Abdul Basit;Dougherty, Patrick M;
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 712-25
379 views DOI Abstract
2013
do information and communication technology access and innovation increase outsourcing in small and medium enterprises?
;María Verónica Alderete
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 303-322
318 views DOI Abstract
2013
the forensic accounting and corporate fraud
;Joshua Onome Imoniana;Maria Thereza P Antunes;Henrique Formigoni
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 119-144
277 views DOI Abstract
2012
10º contecsi
;JISTEM Journal
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
238 views DOI
2011
e-scm and inventory management: a study of multiple cases in a segment of the department store chain
;Juliana Chiaretti Novi;Alexandre Pereira Salgado Junior;Antonio Carlos Pacagnella Junior;Marcio Mattos Borges de Oliveira
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 367-388
145 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,688 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.