Indexed in Journament

the journal of pain : official journal of the american pain society

ISSN 1528-8447· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#7,581
Journament Rank
25
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j pain
Abbreviated Name j pain
ISSN 1528-8447
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-pain

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Parental injustice appraisals in the context of child pain: Examining the construct and criterion validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.
362 views DOI Abstract
2014
Toll-like receptor 4 signaling contributes to Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 712-25
340 views DOI Abstract
2015
Smaller Amygdala Volumes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Healthy Control Individuals.
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 1366-1376
336 views DOI Abstract
2013
2010
erp in the production area: user’s opinions about
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 517-544
249 views Abstract
2010
2014
performance measurement of information technology governance in brazilian financial institutions
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 397-414
233 views DOI Abstract
2013
the forensic accounting and corporate fraud
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 119-144
230 views DOI Abstract
2008
the effects of internet shoppers' trust on their purchasing intention in china
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 269-286
226 views DOI Abstract
2010
adoption of technological innovations in the field of health: a study on information systems in the perspective of the theory of diffusion
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 71-94
206 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parental injustice appraisals in the context of child pain: Examining the construct and criterion validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.
362 views DOI Abstract
2015
social and organizational impacts of the electronic processing system of the brazilian superior tribunal of justice
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 317-332
7 views DOI Abstract
2015
security information in production and operations: a study on audit trails in database systems
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 717-734
160 views Abstract
2015
Smaller Amygdala Volumes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Healthy Control Individuals.
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 1366-1376
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
performance measurement of information technology governance in brazilian financial institutions
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 397-414
233 views DOI Abstract
2014
Toll-like receptor 4 signaling contributes to Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 712-25
340 views DOI Abstract
2013
2013
the forensic accounting and corporate fraud
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 119-144
230 views DOI Abstract
2012
10º contecsi
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
198 views DOI
2011
e-scm and inventory management: a study of multiple cases in a segment of the department store chain
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 367-388
112 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.