Indexed in Journament

bone

ISSN 1873-2763· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,819 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 11.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bone
Abbreviated Name bone
ISSN 1873-2763
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/bone

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 45.0
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 53.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bone
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 28.2
Innovation 45.0 30.1
Community Impact 11.4 11.5
Content Distribution 53.9 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2020
Genetic ablation of SGLT2 function in mice impairs tissue mineral density but does not affect fracture resistance of bone.
, pp. 115254
517 views DOI Abstract
2020
Increased fracture rate in children and adolescents with Marfan syndrome.
, pp. 115333
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
MicroRNA-365 functions as a mechanosensitive microRNA to inhibit end plate chondrocyte degeneration by targeting histone deacetylase 4.
, pp. 115052
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase is an anti-inflammatory nucleotidase.
Vol. 133 , pp. 115262
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Off-label uses of denosumab in metabolic bone diseases.
Vol. 129 , pp. 115048
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Satb2 regulates proliferation and nuclear integrity of pre-osteoblasts.
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Primary cilia act as microgravity sensors by depolymerizing microtubules to inhibit osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization.
, pp. 115346
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Primary cilia act as microgravity sensors by depolymerizing microtubules to inhibit osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization.
, pp. 115346
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Increased fracture rate in children and adolescents with Marfan syndrome.
, pp. 115333
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase is an anti-inflammatory nucleotidase.
Vol. 133 , pp. 115262
411 views DOI Abstract
2020
Genetic ablation of SGLT2 function in mice impairs tissue mineral density but does not affect fracture resistance of bone.
, pp. 115254
517 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
MicroRNA-365 functions as a mechanosensitive microRNA to inhibit end plate chondrocyte degeneration by targeting histone deacetylase 4.
, pp. 115052
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Off-label uses of denosumab in metabolic bone diseases.
Vol. 129 , pp. 115048
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Satb2 regulates proliferation and nuclear integrity of pre-osteoblasts.
370 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,819 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.