Indexed in Journament

annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : aaem

ISSN 1898-2263· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,164
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ann agric environ med
Abbreviated Name annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : aaem
ISSN 1898-2263

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Sepsis caused by Chromobacterium violaceum - probably the first case in Europe, or <i>Macbeth</i> read anew.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 508-510
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial property and antiproliferative activity of Centaurea babylonica (L.) L. on human carcinomas and cervical cancer cell lines.
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 290-297
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is socio-economic status associated with adverse birth outcomes in Poland?
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 369-374
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Scale and forms of domestic violence against schoolchildren in rural, rural-urban and urban areas.
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 572-578
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stress at intellectual work and cardiovascular diseases in women at non-mobility working age.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 456-461
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Across-shift changes in upper airways after exposure to bacterial cell wall components.
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 236-241
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational hazards in opinions of forestry employees in Poland
Vol. 26 , pp. 242-248
352 views DOI
2019
Effectiveness of health-promoting activities in the area of general hearing screening tests in newborns in Poland.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 445-449
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of tuberculosis prophylaxis in patients with HIV/AIDS treated with isoniazid.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 462-467
304 views DOI Abstract
2013
Exposure to aerosols during high-pressure cleaning and relationship with health effects.
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 420-5
301 views Abstract
2019
Scale and forms of domestic violence against schoolchildren in rural, rural-urban and urban areas.
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 572-578
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hope of patients in the terminal phase of cancer and place of residence.
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 636-643
244 views DOI Abstract
2019
Atherogenic lipid profile and health behaviours in women post-menopause working in agriculture.
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 585-591
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
Across-shift changes in upper airways after exposure to bacterial cell wall components.
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 236-241
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Work safety interventions and threat complexity - A formative investigation into why farmers do not act safely.
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 280-289
248 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychometric properties of the Scale for Evaluating Attitudes towards Seniors (SEAS).
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 309-314
199 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does an early rural life influence selected health-related parameters of female university students?
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 322-328
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is socio-economic status associated with adverse birth outcomes in Poland?
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 369-374
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of health-promoting activities in the area of general hearing screening tests in newborns in Poland.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 445-449
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stress at intellectual work and cardiovascular diseases in women at non-mobility working age.
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 456-461
364 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.