Indexed in Journament

soldagem & inspeção

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #9,277 of 33,995 indexed journals
5 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name soldagem & inspeção
Abbreviated Name soldagem & inspeção

Publications Per Year

Articles (5)

0000
The Role of Friction Stir Processing (FSP) Parameters on TiC Reinforced Surface Al7075-T651 Aluminum Alloy
García-Vázquez, Felipe;Vargas-Arista, Benjamín;Muñiz, Rodrigo;Ortiz, Juan Carlos;García, Héctor Hernández;Acevedo, Jorge;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 508-516
600 views Abstract
2010
Metodologia para parametrizar e avaliar a técnica da ''burn-zinc'' no processo de soldagem a ponto por resistência Methodology for parameterize and assessment of the burn-zinc technique in the resistance spot welding process
Nascimento, Vinicius Castanheira do;Scotti, Américo;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 11-21
572 views Abstract
2011
Soldagem por ponto no estado sólido de ligas leves Solid state spot welding of lightweight alloys
Campanelli, Leonardo Contri;Alcântara, Nelson Guedes de;Santos, Jorge Fernandez dos;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 301-307
427 views Abstract
2012
Parameters optimization for friction spot welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy by Taguchi method Otimização dos parâmetros de soldagem por fricção por ponto da liga de magnésio AZ31 pelo método de Taguchi
Campanelli, Leonardo Contri;Suhuddin, Uceu Fuad Hasan;Santos, Jorge Fernandez dos;Alcântara, Nelson Guedes de;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 26-31
398 views Abstract
2012
Engenharia de usabilidade aplicada no desenvolvimento de um sistema interativo para soldagem robotizada Usability engineering applied in development of an interactive system for robotic welding
Okuyama, Marcelo Pompermaier;Merino, Eugênio Andrés Diaz;Dutra, Jair Carlos;Carvalho, Renon Steinbach;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 288-297
341 views Abstract
2012
Parameters optimization for friction spot welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy by Taguchi method Otimização dos parâmetros de soldagem por fricção por ponto da liga de magnésio AZ31 pelo método de Taguchi
Campanelli, Leonardo Contri;Suhuddin, Uceu Fuad Hasan;Santos, Jorge Fernandez dos;Alcântara, Nelson Guedes de;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 26-31
398 views Abstract
2012
Engenharia de usabilidade aplicada no desenvolvimento de um sistema interativo para soldagem robotizada Usability engineering applied in development of an interactive system for robotic welding
Okuyama, Marcelo Pompermaier;Merino, Eugênio Andrés Diaz;Dutra, Jair Carlos;Carvalho, Renon Steinbach;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 288-297
341 views Abstract
2011
Soldagem por ponto no estado sólido de ligas leves Solid state spot welding of lightweight alloys
Campanelli, Leonardo Contri;Alcântara, Nelson Guedes de;Santos, Jorge Fernandez dos;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 301-307
427 views Abstract
2010
Metodologia para parametrizar e avaliar a técnica da ''burn-zinc'' no processo de soldagem a ponto por resistência Methodology for parameterize and assessment of the burn-zinc technique in the resistance spot welding process
Nascimento, Vinicius Castanheira do;Scotti, Américo;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 11-21
572 views Abstract
0000
The Role of Friction Stir Processing (FSP) Parameters on TiC Reinforced Surface Al7075-T651 Aluminum Alloy
García-Vázquez, Felipe;Vargas-Arista, Benjamín;Muñiz, Rodrigo;Ortiz, Juan Carlos;García, Héctor Hernández;Acevedo, Jorge;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 508-516
600 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #9,277 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.