Indexed in Journament

studies in educational evaluation

ISSN 0191-491X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,708 of 29,189 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 59.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name studies in educational evaluation
Abbreviated Name studies in educational evaluation
ISSN 0191-491X

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 18.5
Timeliness 50.0 22.4
Diversity 30.0 29.3
Innovation 40.0 32.1
Community Impact 31.5 15.2
Content Distribution 68.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2019
Teacher feedback and students’ self-regulated learning in mathematics: A comparison between a high-achieving and a low-achieving secondary schools
Guo, W.
Vol. 63 , pp. 48-58
321 views DOI
2019
Development of the ecological concepts of energy flow and materials cycling in middle school students participating in earth education programs
Johnson, B.
Vol. 63 , pp. 94-101
293 views DOI
2020
Reflection through assessment: A systematic narrative review of teacher feedback and student self-perception
Torres, J.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
251 views DOI
2020
Teachers’ beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching English as a foreign language
Vattøy, K.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
248 views DOI
2020
Measurement invariance across information and communication technology development index and gender: The case of the Pearson Test of English Academic reading
Aryadoust, V.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
2020
Test fairness: Examining differential functioning of the reading comprehension section of the GSEEE in China
Min, S.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
197 views DOI
2019
Effect of problem-based learning in pharmacology education: A meta-analysis
Liu, L.
Vol. 60 , pp. 43-58
190 views DOI
2019
Do student and survey characteristics affect the quality of UK undergraduate medical education course evaluation? A systematic review of the literature
Nicolaou, M.
Vol. 62 , pp. 92-103
185 views DOI
2019
Students’ perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes
Gerritsen-van, Leeuwenkamp K.
Vol. 63 , pp. 72-82
166 views DOI
2019
Assessment mindset: Exploring the relationship between teacher mindset and approaches to classroom assessment
DeLuca, C.
Vol. 61 , pp. 159-169
157 views DOI
2020
Feeding back research results – Changes in principal and teacher narratives about student participation
Zala-Mezö, E.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
133 views DOI
2020
Applying Q methodology to teacher evaluation research
Rodl, J.E.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
115 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class” (Studies in Educational Evaluation (2020) 64, (S0191491X19300823), (10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821))
Shen, B.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
120 views DOI
2020
The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class
Shen, B.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
102 views DOI
2020
Teachers’ beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching English as a foreign language
Vattøy, K.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
248 views DOI
2020
Action research as a methodology for professional development in leading an educational process
Klima, Ronen I.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
131 views DOI
2020
Test fairness: Examining differential functioning of the reading comprehension section of the GSEEE in China
Min, S.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
197 views DOI
2020
Measurement invariance across information and communication technology development index and gender: The case of the Pearson Test of English Academic reading
Aryadoust, V.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
2020
Reflection through assessment: A systematic narrative review of teacher feedback and student self-perception
Torres, J.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
251 views DOI
2019
Teaching reading strategies in history lessons: A micro-level analysis of professional development training and its practical challenges
ter, Beek M.
Vol. 63 , pp. 26-40
97 views DOI
Journament Score
38.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,708 of 29,189 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.