Indexed in Journament

implementation science

ISSN 1748-5908· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,508 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 64.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name implementation science
Abbreviated Name implementation science
ISSN 1748-5908

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 83.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for implementation science
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 5.0
Content Distribution 83.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2017
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
534 views DOI Abstract
2010
Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol - Implementation Science
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
478 views DOI Abstract
2012
Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 33-
447 views Abstract
2017
Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
444 views Abstract
2016
Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-38
432 views DOI Abstract
2015
Effects of a demand-led evidence briefing service on the uptake and use of research evidence by commissioners of health services: protocol for a controlled before and after study - Implementation Science
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
430 views DOI Abstract
2018
Toward optimal implementation of cancer prevention and control programs in public health: a study protocol on mis-implementation
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
417 views Abstract
2013
Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
417 views DOI Abstract
2009
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
How was research engaged with and used in the development of 131 policy documents? Findings and measurement implications from a mixed methods study
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 44-
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
How was research engaged with and used in the development of 131 policy documents? Findings and measurement implications from a mixed methods study
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 44-
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
How was research engaged with and used in the development of 131 policy documents? Findings and measurement implications from a mixed methods study
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
Toward optimal implementation of cancer prevention and control programs in public health: a study protocol on mis-implementation
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
417 views Abstract
2017
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study - Implementation Science
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study - Implementation Science
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
Preliminary testing of the reliability and feasibility of SAGE: a system to measure and score engagement with and use of research in health policies and programs
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
534 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
369 views Abstract
2017
Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
444 views Abstract
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,508 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.