Indexed in Journament

international journal of applied linguistics and english literature

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,871 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
86 Articles
Scores higher than 86.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of applied linguistics and english literature
Abbreviated Name international journal of applied linguistics and english literature
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.9
Timeliness 70.0
Diversity 22.2
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 27.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.9 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 70.0 3.0
Diversity 22.2 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.2
Content Distribution 27.3 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (86)

2015
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family and Friends Textbooks: Representation of Genderism
Esmaeili, Saeed;Arabmofrad, Ali;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 55-61
482 views Abstract
2015
The Metaphors on International Intervention: A Discourse Analysis of the Sri Lankan English Newspaper Editorials
Gnanaseelan, Jeyaseelan;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 21-35
470 views Abstract
2012
How Should an Effective Performance Appraisal Be: EFL Teachers’ Perspective
Ali, Holi Ibrahim Holi;
Vol. 1 , No. 7 , pp. 199-208
464 views Abstract
2016
Evaluating Lexical Cohesion in Nigerian Newspaper Genres: Focus on the Editorials
Malah, Zubairu;Tan, Helen;Rashid, Sabariah Md;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 240-256
423 views Abstract
2017
Scope of Cooperative Learning (CL) Strategies in Teaching English to Saudi Adult EFL Learners: A Study of Practical Barriers and Possible Implications
Ishtiaq, Muhammad;Hussain, Muhammad Sabboor;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 110-121
421 views Abstract
2012
Comparison of Gratitude across Context Variations: A Generic Analysis of Dissertation Acknowledgements Written by Taiwanese Authors in EFL and ESL Contexts
Yang, Wenhsien;
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 130-146
417 views Abstract
2015
are e-books effective tools for learning? reading speed and comprehension: ipad® vs. paper
;Suzanne Sackstein;Linda Spark;Amy Jenkins
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 01-14
407 views DOI Abstract
2015
Exploring Parliamentary Debate as a Pedagogical Tool to Develop English Communication Skills in EFL/ESL Classrooms
Aclan, Eunice M.;Aziz, Noor Hashima Abd. ;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-16
389 views Abstract
2014
Ideology in reporting the ‘operation cast lead’, a transitivity analysis of the Arab news and New York times reports
Bello, U.
Vol. 3 , pp. 202-210
384 views DOI
2013
globalisation and the internationalisation of higher education in sub-saharan africa
;Kuzvinetsa Peter Dzvimbo;Kholeka Constance Moloi
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. -
365 views Abstract
2026
The role of teacher gaze in speaking turns during interactive book reading: a multiple case mobile-eye-tracking study
Thibaut Duthois, Susanna Isotalo, Ymke Taillieu, Ruben Vanderlinde, Piet Van Avermaet, Maribel Montero Perez
42 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Country in the voice: resonance, language, and belonging after displacement
Damien Lafont
33 views DOI Abstract
2019
Malaysian School English Language Teachers’ Perceptions on Teaching and Learning
Choe, Foo Lung;Bhatti, Nasreen;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 11-18
179 views Abstract
2018
Not Losing the EFL Plot: L2 Engagement through Literature (Reading Circles) and Producing Short Stories (Creative Writing Circles)
Maher, Kevin M;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 102-105
128 views Abstract
2018
Emasculation of male characters as seen through Sula by Toni Morrison
KPOHOUE, Ferdinand;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 20-25
257 views Abstract
2017
Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language
Li Wei
45 views DOI Abstract
2017
English and Arabic Inscriptions in the Linguistic Landscape of Yemen: A Multilingual Writing Approach
Al-Athwary, Anwar A. H.;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 149-162
315 views Abstract
2017
Analysing Resistance of Stereotyped Sexuality via ‘Gender Performance’ in The Silk Fan and Under the Blanket
Noor, Nurul Soleha binti Mohd;Termizi, Arbaayah Ali;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 219-225
236 views Abstract
2017
Scope of Cooperative Learning (CL) Strategies in Teaching English to Saudi Adult EFL Learners: A Study of Practical Barriers and Possible Implications
Ishtiaq, Muhammad;Hussain, Muhammad Sabboor;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 110-121
421 views Abstract
2017
A Postcolonial Approach to the Problem of Subalternity in Toni Morrison's God Help the Child
Mashaqi, Sahar Abdelkarim Asad;Omari, Kifah (Moh’d Khair) Ali Al;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 177-183
276 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,871 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.