international journal of applied linguistics and english literature | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7319 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international journal of applied linguistics and english literature

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name international journal of applied linguistics and english literature
Abbreviated Name international journal of applied linguistics and english literature
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (85 total)

2015
The Metaphors on International Intervention: A Discourse Analysis of the Sri Lankan English Newspaper Editorials
Gnanaseelan, Jeyaseelan;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 21-35
435 views Abstract
2012
How Should an Effective Performance Appraisal Be: EFL Teachers’ Perspective
Ali, Holi Ibrahim Holi;
Vol. 1 , No. 7 , pp. 199-208
421 views Abstract
2015
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family and Friends Textbooks: Representation of Genderism
Esmaeili, Saeed;Arabmofrad, Ali;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 55-61
418 views Abstract
2016
Evaluating Lexical Cohesion in Nigerian Newspaper Genres: Focus on the Editorials
Malah, Zubairu;Tan, Helen;Rashid, Sabariah Md;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 240-256
399 views Abstract
2012
Comparison of Gratitude across Context Variations: A Generic Analysis of Dissertation Acknowledgements Written by Taiwanese Authors in EFL and ESL Contexts
Yang, Wenhsien;
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 130-146
381 views Abstract
2017
Scope of Cooperative Learning (CL) Strategies in Teaching English to Saudi Adult EFL Learners: A Study of Practical Barriers and Possible Implications
Ishtiaq, Muhammad;Hussain, Muhammad Sabboor;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 110-121
377 views Abstract
2015
Exploring Parliamentary Debate as a Pedagogical Tool to Develop English Communication Skills in EFL/ESL Classrooms
Aclan, Eunice M.;Aziz, Noor Hashima Abd. ;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-16
360 views Abstract
2015
are e-books effective tools for learning? reading speed and comprehension: ipad® vs. paper
;Suzanne Sackstein;Linda Spark;Amy Jenkins
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 01-14
352 views DOI Abstract
2014
Ideology in reporting the ‘operation cast lead’, a transitivity analysis of the Arab news and New York times reports
Bello, U.
Vol. 3 , pp. 202-210
350 views DOI
2016
Terminology evolution and translation: Specificity of referent & user’s epistemic continuum exemplified in Islamic terms
Al-Shabab, O.
Vol. 5 , pp. 94-105
316 views DOI Abstract
View All 85 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.