Validation of curriculum-based reading passages and comparison of college students with and without dyslexia or ADHD.
Clicks: 269
ID: 48991
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.0
/100
261 views
210 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Although reading is an essential skill for college success, little is known about how college students with and without disabilities read within their actual college curriculum. In the present article, we report on two studies addressing this issue. Within study 1, we developed and validated curriculum-based oral reading fluency measures using a sample of college students without disabilities (N = 125). In study 2, we administered the curriculum-based measures to four groups (each with n = 25): college students without disabilities, college students with dyslexia, college students with ADHD, and a clinical control group. Study 1 results indicated that the curriculum-based measures demonstrated good reliability and criterion validity. Results from study 2 indicated that college students with dyslexia were substantially slower readers than all groups without dyslexia (ds > 1.8). The curriculum-based measures demonstrated high accuracy in classifying participants with dyslexia and with impaired oral reading fluency (area under the curve > .94). Implications for incorporating curriculum-based measures in postsecondary settings are discussed.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (151 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
nelson2019validationannals
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nelson, Jason M;Lindstrom, Will;Foels, Patricia A;Lamkin, Joanna;Dwyer, Lucia; |
| Journal | annals of dyslexia |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s11881-019-00183-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.