Review: Effects of Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Nutrient Cycling on Stocking Strategies for Cow-Calf and Stocker Programs
Clicks: 274
ID: 268153
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
274 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Stocking strategies for cow-calf and stocker programs will require different management decisions in response to increasing input costs. With yearlong ownership of cows, costs of fertilization for DM production of pastures and storage of forages are the primary obstacles for positive economic returns. The implementation of legumes into both cool-season and warm-season perennial grass pastures for biological N fixation is intensified by management seeking to reduce input costs. Biological N fixation by the symbiotic forage legume-Rhizobium relationship is dependent on environmental factors as well as the specificity between legume species and Rhizobium strain. The quantity of atmospheric N fixed through forage legume biological N fixation can range as high as 200 kg/ha per year. The seasonality attributes of stocker cattle ownership allow for stocking strategies that may actually intensify short-term fertilizer inputs but use the strategic impact of nutrient cycling to enhance or sustain the perennial grass-based pasture systems. The transfer of N fixed by legumes to companion or follow-up grasses is much less than that of N fixation and is primarily dependent on animal excreta and legume plant decomposition. Stocking rate becomes the primary management strategy of concern that strives to match forage DM production with animal performance expectations and sustainable pastures for economic ventures.
| Reference Key |
smith2010thereview:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | F.M. Rouquette,G.R. Smith;F.M. Rouquette;G.R. Smith; |
| Journal | The Professional Animal Scientist |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30572-6
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.