when 'you' isn’t you: the attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech

In language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts that 'you 'should be easier to process than 'I 'or 'he', especially for children. But not all occurrences of 'you 'can be correctly interpreted via self-ascription. We consider two cases where 'you 'does not indicate self-ascription: interpretation as an eavesdropper and direct speech. In our experiment, we compare children’s interpretation of the pronouns 'I', 'you 'and 'he', in both direct and indirect reported speech, and in both addressee and eavesdropping situations. We tested 71 five-year-olds, 63 nine-year-olds, and 52 adults in a referent-selection task and found a clear 'de se 'effect for children when directly addressed: they performed better with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in indirect speech, but worse with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in direct speech. We explain the latter finding in terms of the attraction of the 'de se 'interpretation strategy, which leads addressees to automatically self-ascribe 'you 'even in a direct speech report.