Minimal effects of reduced teaching hours on undergraduate medical student learning outcomes and course evaluations.
Clicks: 389
ID: 20948
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
64.2
/100
389 views
266 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #11 of 66 articles by views in medical teacher
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Various pressures exist for curricular change, including economic forces, burgeoning knowledge, broadening learning outcomes, and improving quality and outcomes of learning experiences. In an Australian 5-year undergraduate medical course, staff were asked to reduce teaching hours by 20% to alleviate perceived overcrowded preclinical curriculum, achieve operating efficiencies and liberate time for students' self-directed learning. A case study design with mixed methods was used to evaluate outcomes. Teaching hours were reduced by 198 hours (14%) overall, lectures by 153 hours (19%) and other learning activities by 45 hours (7%). Summative assessment scores did not change significantly after the reductions: 0.4% increase, 1.5% decrease and 1.7% increase in Years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The percentage of students successfully completing their academic year did not change significantly: 94.4% before and 93.3% after the reductions. Student evaluations from eVALUate surveys changed little, except workload was perceived to be more reasonable. Teaching hours, particularly lectures, can be moderately reduced with little impact on student learning outcomes or satisfaction with an undergraduate medical course.
| Reference Key |
choilundberg2019minimalmedical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Choi-Lundberg, Derek L;Al-Aubaidy, Hayder A;Burgess, John R;Clifford, Christine A;Cuellar, William A;Errey, Judi A;Harper, Amanda J;Malley, Roslyn C;Ross, Renee M;Williams, Anne-Marie M;Hays, Richard; |
| Journal | medical teacher |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652258
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.