workplace ‘learning’ and adult education: messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
Clicks: 210
ID: 156242
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
8.4
/100
28 views
28 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This article reviews diverse representations of learning evident among published accounts of workplace learning across fields such as adult education, human resource development, management and organisation studies. The discussion critically addresses the question of how to mediate a multiplicity of definitional, ideological and purposive orientations. The argument here is that the issue is not perspectival, but ontological. The critical problem lies in mistaking learning as a single object when in fact it is enacted as multiple objects, as very different things in different logics of study and practice. Particularly in the contested arena of work as a site of economic conflict and production, learning needs to be appreciated as a messy object, existing in different states, or perhaps a series of different objects that are patched together through some manufactured linkages.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (131 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
fenwick2010europeanworkplace
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Tara Fenwick |
| Journal | annals of the university of oradea: fascicle of textiles, leatherwork |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.