exemples d'interprétation de résultats de dégustation

Clicks: 247
ID: 136660
1986
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #25 of 75 articles by views in meta gene

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
De nombreux auteurs ont proposé des méthodes et des tables pour l'interprétation de résultats de dégustation, notamment ROESSLER et al. (1978) pour les tests de différence et KRAMER (1956, 1974) pour les tests de classement. Ces dernières ont été remises en question par JOANES (1985) et SMITH (1985) préconise le test de FRIEDMAN. Les méthodes d'analyses multidimensionnelles (AC.P. et A.F.C.) permettent l'interprétation de dégustations descriptives (notation ou appréciation d'un vin sur plusieurs paramètres). Des exemples sont donnés pour développer l'utilisation de ces méthodes en oenologie. +++ Statistics seem to be essential in a sensory valuation, not only to interpret the results but also to define the experimental protocol, to distribute samples in a balanced way, to avoid the effect of sytematic mistakes (SAUVAGEOT 81). A lot of authors proposed methods of calculs and tables: KRAMER (1956), KRAMER et al. (1974), ROESSLER et al. (1978), LARMOND (1969), TOMASSONE et FLANZY (1977). A. JOANES (1985) has just called in question again validity of KRAMER's tables (very used in œnology) it was important for us to present with few examples, some methods of interpretation of difference and preference tests. We especially use « duo trio and triangle tests ». The last one, more difficult, must be done with a expert panel. ROESSLER and al. (1978) proposed tables giving critical values (number of correct answers) at different probability levels. So we advise the FRIEDMAN's test; it's a non parametric method, with which you can know if one wine is different or not. Two wines are different if the difference between their rank sums is rank above a value determined with the NEWMAN's test. The descriptive tasting (appreciation of a wine with several variables: colour, arome intensity, sourness, bitterness...) give more informations. Two methods of multidimensional analysis are proposed to take into account the entire information: - The principal components analysis if the results are presented as quantitative variables, - The correspondance analysis if the results are presented as qualitative variables. Examples of interpretations are proposed to develope the use of theses methods in œnology. That's easier with the introduction of the micro-computer.
Reference Key
barillre1986oenoexemples Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Jean-Marie Barillère;Pierre Bénard
Journal meta gene
Year 1986
DOI
10.20870/oeno-one.1986.20.3.1302
URL
https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/1302
Keywords
statistics wine interpretationagriculturebotany

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.