zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue | Journament

Journal Ranking

#243 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Abbreviated Name zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
ISSN 2095-4352
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (149 total)

2015
glycolipid metabolism disorder in the liver of obese mice is improved by tudca via the restoration of defective hepatic autophagy
;Qinyue Guo;Qindong Shi;Huixia Li;Jiali Liu;Shufang Wu;Hongzhi Sun;Bo Zhou
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
451 views DOI Abstract
2013
incidental thyroid carcinoma diagnosed after total thyroidectomy for benign thyroid diseases: incidence and association with thyroid disease type and laboratory markers
;D. Askitis;E. I. Efremidou;M. Karanikas;A. Mitrakas;G. Tripsianis;A. Polychronidis;N. Liratzopoulos
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
the clinical features of cystic parathyroid adenoma in chinese population: a single-center experience
;Ya Hu;Ming Cui;Yu Xia;Zhe Su;Xiang Zhang;Quan Liao;Yuxin Jiang;Yupei Zhao
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
407 views DOI Abstract
2015
shear wave velocity: a new quantitative index to estimate the status of thyroid in diffuse thyroid disease
;Lin-Yao Du;Qiao Ji;Xiu-Juan Hou;Xiao-Lei Wang;Xian-Li Zhou
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Design and implementation of an integrated information platform for emergency interconnection].
Mao, Shanlin;Xu, Wenpeng;Ge, Zi;Cao, Jun;Xia, Zhijie;
Vol. 31 , No. 7 , pp. 884-889
343 views DOI Abstract
2014
the protective effect of beraprost sodium on diabetic cardiomyopathy through the inhibition of the p38 mapk signaling pathway in high-fat-induced sd rats
;Jie Li;Li Peng;Hong Du;Yangtian Wang;Bin Lu;Yixin Xu;Xiaozhen Ye;Jiaqing Shao
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
333 views DOI Abstract
2015
antithyroid antibodies and thyroid function in pediatric patients with celiac disease
;Derya Kalyoncu;Nafiye Urganci
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Predictive value of serum procalcitonin and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels in patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with infection].
Wang, Huadong;
Vol. 31 , No. 8 , pp. 962-966
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Application of lean management in cost control of cerebral infarction single disease in stroke center].
Qin, Cheng;Pan, Luping;Chen, Qiuyue;Lin, Qiao;Zhang, Danhong;
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 637-640
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Predictive value of myoglobin and D-dimer on severe heat stroke: a clinical analysis of 38 patients with severe heat stroke].
Liu, Qingyu;Li, Chunsheng;
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 594-597
313 views DOI Abstract
View All 149 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.