journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2 / 33,622
🥈 Very Good
Overall Score
78.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
72
Accessibility
85
Timeliness
69
Diversity
74
Innovation
80
Community Impact
77
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name j neuroeng rehabil
Abbreviated Name journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN 1743-0003
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2018
Post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: virtual reality-based navigation and detection tasks reveal lateralized and non-lateralized deficits in tasks of varying perceptual and cognitive demands
Ogourtsova, Tatiana;Archambault, Philippe S.;Lamontagne, Anouk;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
381 views Abstract
2019
Intensive virtual reality and robotic based upper limb training compared to usual care, and associated cortical reorganization, in the acute and early sub-acute periods post-stroke: a feasibility study.
Patel, Jigna;Fluet, Gerard;Qiu, Qinyin;Yarossi, Mathew;Merians, Alma;Tunik, Eugene;Adamovich, Sergei;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 92
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Claret, Claudia Ramos;Herget, Georg W;Kouba, Lukas;Wiest, Daniel;Adler, Jochen;von Tscharner, Vinzenz;Stieglitz, Thomas;Pasluosta, Cristian;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 115
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
GEARing smart environments for pediatric motor rehabilitation.
Kokkoni, Elena;Mavroudi, Effrosyni;Zehfroosh, Ashkan;Galloway, James C;Vidal, Renè;Heinz, Jeffrey;Tanner, Herbert G;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 16
282 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of supraspinal feedback on human gait: rhythmic auditory distortion.
Forner-Cordero, Arturo;Pinho, João Pedro;Umemura, Guilherme;Lourenço, João Carlos;Mezêncio, Bruno;Itiki, Cinthia;Krebs, Hermano Igo;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 159
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relearning functional and symmetric walking after stroke using a wearable device: a feasibility study.
Kim, Seok Hun;Huizenga, David E;Handzic, Ismet;Ditwiler, Rebecca Edgeworth;Lazinski, Matthew;Ramakrishnan, Tyagi;Bozeman, Andrea;Rose, David Z;Reed, Kyle B;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 106
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fore-aft resistance applied at the center of mass using a novel robotic interface proportionately increases propulsive force generation in healthy nonimpaired individuals walking at a constant speed.
Naidu, Avantika;Graham, Sarah A;Brown, David A;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 111
269 views DOI Abstract
2005
Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M;Hausdorff, Jeffrey M;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
251 views DOI Abstract
2005
Initial development and testing of a novel foam-based pressure sensor for wearable sensing
Barry, Smyth;Sarah, Brady;E, Dunne Lucy;Dermot, Diamond;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 4-
233 views Abstract
2005
Initial development and testing of a novel foam-based pressure sensor for wearable sensing.
Dunne, Lucy E;Brady, Sarah;Smyth, Barry;Diamond, Dermot;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 4
230 views Abstract
79
Overall
Very Good
72
85
74
80
77
69
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

78.5/100

Tier: Very Good

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

72.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

85.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

74.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

80.1/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

76.8/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

68.5/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.