gastroenterology research and practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#479 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ يوم

gastroenterology research and practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
ncbi doaj ulakbim
الاسم المختصر gastroenterol res pract
الاسم المختصر gastroenterol res pract
ISSN 1687-6121
الهدف والنطاق
URL
تعليمات المؤلفين
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (73 total)

2019
The Efficacy of Flupentixol-Melitracen in the Adjuvant Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis in the Chinese Population: A Meta-Analysis
Zhou, Xiaoqian;Zhao, Lei;Yang, Ping;Chen, Yaxi;Ruan, Xiong Z.;Zhou, Xiaoqian;Zhao, Lei;Yang, Ping;Chen, Yaxi;Ruan, Xiong Z.;
Vol. 2019
519 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of Minocycline-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapies as First-Line Regimens in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
Zhang, Lingyun;Lan, Yu;Wang, Qi;Zhang, Yuexia;Si, Xiaobei;
Vol. 2019 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
2019
The Clinical and Steroid-Free Remission of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis
Lam, Wai Ching;Zhao, Chen;Ma, Wen Juan;Yao, Liang;Lam, Wai Ching;Zhao, Chen;Ma, Wen Juan;Yao, Liang;
Vol. 2019
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Colonic Wall Thickening Reported in Abdominal CT: Does It Always Imply Malignancy?
Akbas, A;Bakir, H;Dasiran, M F;Dagmura, H;Daldal, E;Ozsoy, Z;Ozmen, Z;Demir, O;Okan, I;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 2492097
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review
Latenstein, Carmen S. S.;Wennmacker, Sarah Z.;de Jong, Judith J.;van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.;Drenth, Joost P. H.;de Reuver, Philip R.;Latenstein, Carmen S. S.;Wennmacker, Sarah Z.;de Jong, Judith J.;van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.;Drenth, Joost P. H.;de Reuver, Philip R.;
Vol. 2019
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recent Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers in Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Wang, Kewei;Tao, Guozhong;Sun, Zhen;Sylvester, Karl G.;Wang, Kewei;Tao, Guozhong;Sun, Zhen;Sylvester, Karl G.;
Vol. 2019
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Current and Emerging Trends in Clinical and Translational Research
Koumpa, Foteini Stefania;Xylas, Diamantis;Konopka, Maciej;Galea, Dieter;Veselkov, Kirill;Antoniou, Anthony;Mehta, Akash;Mirnezami, Reza;Koumpa, Foteini Stefania;Xylas, Diamantis;Konopka, Maciej;Galea, Dieter;Veselkov, Kirill;Antoniou, Anthony;Mehta, Akash;Mirnezami, Reza;
Vol. 2019
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Probiotics for Alleviating Alcoholic Liver Injury.
Gu, Zelin;Liu, Yanlong;Hu, Shumeng;You, Ying;Wen, Jiaqi;Li, Wancong;Wang, Yuhua;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 9097276
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
Work Productivity Loss in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in Turkey
Topal, Firdevs;Camyar, Hakan;Yuksel, Elif Saritas;Gunay, Suleyman;Topal, Fatih;Gür, Emine Özlem;
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
286 views Abstract
2019
A Practical Review of Cytomegalovirus in Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Fakhreddine, Ali Y.;Frenette, Catherine T.;Konijeti, Gauree G.;Fakhreddine, Ali Y.;Frenette, Catherine T.;Konijeti, Gauree G.;
Vol. 2019
250 views DOI Abstract
View All 73 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.