acs combinatorial science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#34 / 33,720
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
48.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
87
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

acs combinatorial science

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name acs comb sci
Abbreviated Name acs comb sci
ISSN 2156-8944
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (526 total)

2017
detoxification of a lignocellulosic waste from a pulp mill to enhance its fermentation prospects
;Tamara Llano;Natalia Quijorna;Alberto Coz
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 348-
497 views DOI Abstract
2018
methods for advanced wind turbine condition monitoring and early diagnosis: a literature review
;Md Liton Hossain;Ahmed Abu-Siada;S. M. Muyeen
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 1309-
327 views DOI Abstract
2016
a stackelberg game theoretic analysis of incentive effects under perceived risk for china’s straw-based power plant supply chain
;Lingling Wang;Tsunemi Watanabe
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 455-
320 views DOI Abstract
2015
the socio-demographic and psychological predictors of residential energy consumption: a comprehensive review
;Elisha R. Frederiks;Karen Stenner;Elizabeth V. Hobman
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 573-609
308 views DOI Abstract
2012
seasonal variation of lipids and fatty acids of the microalgae <em>nannochloropsis oculata </em>grown in outdoor large-scale photobioreactors
;Catherine Legrand;Emmelie Nilsson;Jean Pascal BergΓ©;Pauliina Uronen;VictΓ³ria del Pino;Martin Olofsson;Teresa Lamela
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 1577-1592
289 views DOI Abstract
2016
a hybrid multi-step model for forecasting day-ahead electricity price based on optimization, fuzzy logic and model selection
;Ping Jiang;Feng Liu;Yiliao Song
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 618-
284 views DOI Abstract
2015
engineering plant biomass lignin content and composition for biofuels and bioproducts
;Cassie Marie Welker;Vimal Kumar Balasubramanian;Carloalberto Petti;Krishan Mohan Rai;Seth DeBolt;Venugopal Mendu
Vol. 8 , No. 8 , pp. 7654-7676
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
in situ surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy study of the electrocatalytic effect of ptfe/c nanocatalyst on ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline medium
;A. C. Gómez-MonsivÑis;I. VelÑzquez-HernÑndez;L. Álvarez-Contreras;M. Guerra-BalcÑzar;L. G. Arriaga;N. Arjona;J. Ledesma-García
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 290-
269 views DOI Abstract
2018
overview of electric field applications in energy and process engineering
;Lars Zigan
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 1361-
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
modeling and performance analysis of state transitions for energy-efficient femto base stations
;YunWon Chung
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 4629-4646
252 views DOI Abstract
View All 526 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
87
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

86.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.