spermova | Journament

Journal Ranking

#352 / 33,811
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

spermova

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name spermova
Abbreviated Name spermova
ISSN 2223-9375
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (196 total)

2012
three-dimensional ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta
;Pei-Yin Tsai;Chiung-Hsin Chang;Chen-Hsiang Yu;Yueh-Chin Cheng;Fong-Ming Chang
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 387-392
446 views DOI Abstract
2013
fertility after “only b-lynch” suture: a case report and literature review
;Sandro Gerli;Alessandro Favilli;Claudia Giordano;Silvia Pericoli;Elena Laurenti;Gian Carlo Di Renzo
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 110-112
405 views DOI Abstract
2018
carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in cesarean deliveries
;Hian Yan Voon;Haris Njoo Suharjono;Asrul Akmal Shafie;Mohamad Adam Bujang
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 332-339
381 views DOI Abstract
2016
detection of recurrent 4p16.3 microdeletion with 2p25.3 microduplication by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization in a fetus from a family with wolf–hirschhorn syndrome
;Wen-Xu Yang;Hong Pan;Song-Tao Wang;Lin Li;Hai-Rong Wu;Yu Qi
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 104-108
376 views DOI Abstract
2009
prenatal diagnosis of mos45,x/46,x,+mar in a fetus with normal male external genitalia and a literature review
;Shu-Chin Chien;Chih-Ping Chen;Chyi-Chyang Lin;Li-Chia Huang;Cheng-Tiao Hsieh;Fuu-Jen Tsai
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 292-295
364 views DOI Abstract
2005
effects of antenatal betamethasone and dexamethasone in preterm neonates
;Chen-Yu Chen;Kuo-Gon Wang;Tung-Yao Chang;Chie-Pein Chen;Jun-Hun Loo
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 247-251
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
perinatal imaging findings and molecular genetic analysis of thanatophoric dysplasia type 1 in a fetus with a c.2419t>g (p.ter807gly) (x807g) mutation in fgfr3
;Shin-Wen Chen;Chih-Ping Chen;Liang-Kai Wang;Schu-Rern Chern;Pei-Chen Wu;Yen-Ni Chen;Chen-Ju Lin;Wen-Ling Chen;Wayseen Wang
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 87-92
361 views DOI Abstract
2017
relationship between alcohol consumption and age at menopause: the korea national health and nutrition examination survey
;Jeong In Choi;Kyung-do Han;Dae Woo Lee;Min Jeong Kim;Yeon Joo Shin;Hae Nam Lee
Vol. 56 , No. 4 , pp. 482-486
361 views DOI Abstract
2015
breastfeeding effects on visfatin levels in postpartum women
;Ching-Ju Shen;Shih-Han Wang;Chien-Hung Lee;Te-Fu Chan
Vol. 54 , No. 3 , pp. 217-220
349 views DOI Abstract
2010
mosaic trisomy 7 at amniocentesis: prenatal diagnosis and molecular genetic analyses
;Chih-Ping Chen;Yi-Ning Su;Schu-Rern Chern;Yuh-Ming Hwu;Shuan-Pei Lin;Chyong-Hsin Hsu;Fuu-Jen Tsai;Tao-Yeuan Wang;Pei-Chen Wu;Chen-Chi Lee;Yu-Ting Chen;Li-Feng Chen;Wayseen Wang
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. 333-340
332 views DOI Abstract
View All 196 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.