Transplantation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#376 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 22 hours ago

Transplantation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Transplantation
Abbreviated Name transplantation
ISSN 1534-6080
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (105 total)

2019
Interventions to Prevent Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers in Recipients of a Solid Organ Transplant: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chung, Edmund Y M;Palmer, Suetonia C;Strippoli, Giovanni F M;
Vol. 103 , No. 6 , pp. 1206-1215
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exercise for Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients: A Joint Position Statement of the Canadian Society of Transplantation and CAN-RESTORE.
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania;Mathur, Sunita;Deliva, Robin;Howes, Nancy;Patterson, Catherine;Räkel, Agnès;So, Stephanie;Wickerson, Lisa;White, Michel;Avitzur, Yaron;Johnston, Olwyn;Heywood, Norine;Singh, Sunita;Holdsworth, Sandra;
Vol. 103 , No. 9 , pp. e220-e238
345 views DOI Abstract
1998
Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infections by the CD8+CD38+ T-cell subset in kidney transplant recipients
Belles-Isles M;Houde I;Lachance JG;Noël R;Kingma I;Roy R;;
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. -
324 views Abstract
2019
Practical considerations for APOL1 genotyping in the living kidney donor evaluation.
Mena-Gutierrez, Alejandra M;Reeves-Daniel, Amber M;Jay, Colleen L;Freedman, Barry I;
306 views DOI Abstract
2011
Early steroid withdrawal and optimization of mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.
Le Meur, Yannick;Thierry, Antoine;Glowacki, François;Rerolle, Jean-Philippe;Garrigue, Valerie;Ouali, Nacera;Heng, Anne-Elisabeth;Delahousse, Michel;Albano, Laeticia;Lang, Philippe;Couzi, Lionel;Jaureguy, Maite;Lebranchu, Yvon;Mousson, Christiane;Glotz, Denis;Kessler, Michele;Vrtovsnik, François;Rouanet, Stephanie;Tagieva, Nailya;Kamar, Nassim;
Vol. 92 , No. 11 , pp. 1244-51
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: the 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplant Society Working Group.
Schinstock, Carrie A;Mannon, Roslyn B;Budde, Klemens;Chong, Anita S;Haas, Mark;Knechtle, Stuart;Lefaucheur, Carmen;Montgomery, Robert A;Nickerson, Peter;Tullius, Stefan G;Ahn, Curie;Askar, Medhat;Crespo, Marta;Chadban, Steven J;Feng, Sandy;Jordan, Stanley C;Man, Kwan;Mengel, Michael;Morris, Randall E;O'Doherty, Inish;Ozdemir, Binnaz H;Seron, Daniel;Tambur, Anat R;Tanabe, Kazunari;Taupin, Jean-Luc;O'Connell, Philip J;
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sex and Gender Considerations in Transplant Research: A Scoping Review.
Laprise, Claudie;Cole, Katherine;Sridhar, Vikas Srinivasan;Marenah, Tida;Crimi, Cassandra;West, Lori;Foster, Bethany J;Pilote, Louise;Sapir-Pichhadze, Ruth;
Vol. 103 , No. 9 , pp. e239-e247
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Induction of Accommodation by Anti-complement Component 5 Antibody-based Immunosuppression in ABO-incompatible Heart Transplantation.
Park, Sunjoo;Lee, Jae-Ghi;Jang, Joon Young;Ryu, Jung-Hwa;Kim, Dong Jo;Chang, Shin Jae;Kim, Hyori;Chung, Junho;West, Lori;Yang, Jaeseok;
Vol. 103 , No. 9 , pp. e248-e255
281 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does Sex, Race, and the Size of a Kidney Transplant Candidate's Social Network Affect the Number of Living Donor Requests? A Multi-Center Social Network Analysis of Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist.
Gillespie, Avrum;Gardiner, Heather M;Fink, Edward Laurence;Reese, Peter P;Gadegbeku, Crystal A;Obradovic, Zoran;
268 views DOI Abstract
2019
Organ Procurement Organization Run Department of Motor Vehicle Registration and Drivers Licensing Offices Leads to Increased Organ Donor First Person Authorization Registrations.
Dageforde, Leigh Anne;Muren, William;Chang, Su-Hsin;Vachharajani, Neeta;Brockmeier, Diane;Yu, Jennifer;Anderson, Blaire;Shenoy, Surendra;Lin, Yiing;Khan, Adeel;Wellen, Jason;Chapman, William;Doyle, Majella;
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 105 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.