The Science of the total environment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#13 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
49.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
33
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
54
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

The Science of the total environment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Sci Total Environ
Abbreviated Name sci total environ
ISSN 1879-1026
Aim and Scope
Science of the Total Environment is an international multi-disciplinary journal for publication of original research on the total environment, which includes the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, lithosphere, and anthroposphere.
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/science-of-the-total-environment
Author Instructions https://www.elsevier.com/journals/science-of-the-total-environment/0048-9697/guide-for-authors
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 11, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (637 total)

2019
Farm ponds in southern China: Challenges and solutions for conserving a neglected wetland ecosystem.
Vol. 659 , pp. 1322-1334
694 views DOI Abstract
2019
Background levels of dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dlPCBs), polychlorinated, polybrominated and mixed halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs, PBDD/Fs & PXDD/Fs) in sera of pregnant women in Accra, Ghana.
Vol. 673 , pp. 631-642
675 views DOI Abstract
2019
Historical variation of black carbon and PAHs over the last ~200 years in central North China: Evidence from lake sediment records.
Vol. 690 , pp. 891-899
611 views DOI Abstract
2019
A spatio-temporal perspective of China's industrial circular economy development.
, pp. 135754
548 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bioaccumulation of benzo[a]pyrene nonextractable residues in soil by Eisenia fetida and associated background-level sublethal genotoxicity (DNA single-strand breaks).
Vol. 691 , pp. 605-610
522 views DOI Abstract
2019
Edge effect imprint on elemental traits of plant-invertebrate food web components of oilseed rape fields.
Vol. 687 , pp. 1285-1294
521 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway.
Vol. 719 , pp. 137353
508 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid aerobic visible-light-driven photo-reduction of nitrobenzene.
Vol. 710 , pp. 136322
481 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhanced electrochemical performances of peanut shell derived activated carbon and its FeO nanocomposites for capacitive deionization of Cr(VI) ions.
Vol. 691 , pp. 713-726
475 views DOI Abstract
50
Overall
Below Average
33
45
30
70
54
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

49.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

33.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

54.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.