Journal of colloid and interface science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#250 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 小时前

Journal of colloid and interface science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
索引数
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
简称 J Colloid Interface Sci
缩写名称 j colloid interface sci
ISSN 1095-7103
宗旨与范围
URL
作者须知

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (128 total)

2019
Triple stimuli-responsive ZnO quantum dots-conjugated hollow mesoporous carbon nanoplatform for NIR-induced dual model antitumor therapy.
Feng, Shuang;Mao, Yuling;Wang, Xiudan;Zhou, Meiting;Lu, Hongyan;Zhao, Qinfu;Wang, Siling;
Vol. 559 , pp. 51-64
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Room-temperature synthesis of OMS-2 hybrids as highly efficient catalysts for pollutant degradation via peroxymonosulfate activation.
Ye, Peng;Zou, Qiancheng;An, Luyang;Wei, Yi;Xu, Aihua;Li, Xiaoxia;
Vol. 535 , pp. 481-490
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
Three-dimensional palladium-rhodium nanosheet assemblies: Highly efficient catalysts for methanol electrooxidation.
Shang, Hongyuan;Xu, Hui;Jin, Liujun;Chen, Chunyan;Wang, Cheng;Song, Tongxin;Du, Yukou;
Vol. 556 , pp. 360-365
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fabrication of silver seeds and nanoparticle on core-shell Ag@SiO<inf>2</inf> nanohybrids for combined photothermal therapy and bioimaging
Manivannan K.
Vol. 537 , pp. 604-614
388 views DOI
2020
Facile synthesis of paper based graphene electrodes for point of care devices: A double stranded DNA (dsDNA) biosensor.
Mohanraj, J;Durgalakshmi, D;Rakkesh, R Ajay;Balakumar, S;Rajendran, Saravanan;Karimi-Maleh, Hassan;
Vol. 566 , pp. 463-472
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tuning manganese (III) species in manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieve by interaction with carbon nanofibers for enhanced pollutant degradation in the presence of peroxymonosulfate
Wang M.
Vol. 536 , pp. 271-280
377 views DOI
2019
Hydrophobic silver nanoparticles interacting with phospholipids and stratum corneum mimic membranes in Langmuir monolayers.
Villanueva, Martín E;Lanterna, Anabel E;Vico, Raquel V;
Vol. 543 , pp. 247-255
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Three-dimensional graphene network deposited with mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbon from non-solvent induced phase inversion for high-performance supercapacitors.
Kong, Lirong;Ma, Qiang;Xu, Zhongyun;Shen, Xiaoping;Wang, Jianyue;Zhu, Jun;
Vol. 558 , pp. 21-31
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Corrigendum to “A linear regime of hysteresis for calculating the dynamic contact angle under low capillary numbers with displacement experiments in microscale PDMS microchannels”. [J. Colloid Interface Sci. 560 (2020) 626–638](S0021979719312184)(10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.038)
Wen, M.
Vol. 563 , pp. 447
355 views DOI
2017
Spray-drying-assisted reassembly of uniform and large micro-sized MIL-101 microparticles with controllable morphologies for benzene adsorption.
Zhang, Aijian;Li, Xin-Yu;Zhang, Shengyu;Yu, Zhikai;Gao, Xingmin;Wei, Xiangru;Wu, Zhangxiong;Wu, Winston Duo;Chen, Xiao Dong;
Vol. 506 , pp. 1-9
344 views DOI Abstract
View All 128 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.