indian journal of dental research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#503 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 hours ago

indian journal of dental research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name indian journal of dental research
Abbreviated Name indian journal of dental research
ISSN 0970-9290
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2019
Fluoride concentration of bottled water and public water in Lebanon
Doumit, Mounir;Aad, Lamia Abi;Machmouchi, Mouhamad;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 375-380
697 views Abstract
2017
Sialic acid as a biomarker of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer
Achalli;Sonika Achalli;Medhini Madi;Subhas G Babu;Shishir Ram Shetty;Suchetha Kumari;Supriya Bhat;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 395-
520 views DOI Abstract
2016
Comparison of two systems of tooth numbering among undergraduate dental students
Kannan, Deepthi;Gurunathan, Deepa;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 378-382
454 views Abstract
2010
Efficacy and acceptability of 0.074% diclofenac-containing mouthwash after periodontal surgery: A clinical study
Sangita, Agarwal;Setu, Mathur;Shaila, Kothiwale;Amit, Benjamin;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 408-412
375 views Abstract
2017
complicated lemierre syndrome caused by <em>streptococcus gordonii </em> and possible rickettsial co-infection in a patient with thrombophilia predisposition
;Antreas Iacovou Ioannou;Dimitra Dimitriou;Panagiotis Dimitriou;Aram Katsios;Georgios Petrikkos
Vol. 4 , No. 5 , pp. -
337 views DOI Abstract
2008
Evaluation of salivary sialic acid, total protein, and total sugar in oral cancer: A preliminary report
Sanjay;PR Sanjay;Kaveri Hallikeri;AR Shivashankara;
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 288-
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
use of infrared thermography in diagnosing necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency department: a case study
;Mikkel Brabrand;Jan Dahlin;Marianne Fløjstrup;Stine Thorhauge Zwisler;Jens Michelsen;Louise Gramstrup Nielsen;Jens Ahm Sørensen
Vol. 4 , No. 10 , pp. -
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
the successful use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in systemic lupus erythematosus-induced diffuse alveolar haemorrhage
;Faye Pais;Mohamed Fayed;Timothy Evans
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
261 views DOI Abstract
2011
Implant-supported auricular prosthesis
Nanda, Aditi;Jain, Veena;Kumar, Rakesh;Kabra, Krishna;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 152-156
260 views Abstract
2009
The influence of water temperature during toothbrushing on root dentine: An <i> in vitro</i> study
Tais, Scaramucci;Marcia, Marques;D, Soares-Geraldo;SRM, Braga;Maria, Sobral;
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 185-189
255 views Abstract
View All 42 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.