drinking water engineering and science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#120 / 33,817
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

drinking water engineering and science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name drinking water engineering and science
Abbreviated Name drinking water engineering and science
ISSN 1996-9457
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2016
evidence for heterosis in italian ryegrass (lolium multiflorum lam.) based on inbreeding depression in f2 generation offspring from biparental crosses
;Junping Wang;Luke W. Pembleton;Noel O. I. Cogan;John W. Forster
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 49-
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
variation and correlations among european and north american orchardgrass germplasm for herbage yield and nutritive value
;Joseph G. Robins;B. Shaun Bushman;Ulf Feuerstein;Greg Blaser
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 61-
287 views DOI Abstract
2013
a review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics
;Christoph Müller;Claudia Kammann;Tim J. Clough;Leo M. Condron
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 275-293
276 views DOI Abstract
2012
evaluation of maize germplasm for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation
;Michael H. Blanco;Gary L. Windham;W. Brien Henry
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 28-39
255 views DOI Abstract
2013
impact of biochar on organic contaminants in soil: a tool for mitigating risk?
;Kirk T. Semple;Uchenna Ogbonnaya
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 349-375
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
yield stability in winter wheat production: a survey on german farmers’ and advisors’ views
;Janna Macholdt;Bernd Honermeier
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 45-
242 views DOI Abstract
2020
evaluating biochar-microbe synergies for improved growth, yield of maize, and post-harvest soil characteristics in a semi-arid climate
;Maqshoof Ahmad;Xiukang Wang;Thomas H. Hilger;Muhammad Luqman;Farheen Nazli;Azhar Hussain;Zahir Ahmad Zahir;Muhammad Latif;Qudsia Saeed;Hina Ahmed Malik;Adnan Mustafa
Vol. 10 , No. 1055 , pp. 1055-
239 views DOI Abstract
2008
Modeling of RO/NF membrane rejections of PhACs and organic compounds: a statistical analysis
Amy, G.;Kennedy, M.;Kim, T.-U.;Yangali-Quintanilla, V.;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 7-15
237 views Abstract
2018
effects of maize residue biochar amendments on soil properties and soil loss on acidic hutton soil
;Patrick Nyambo;Thembalethu Taeni;Cornelius Chiduza;Tesfay Araya
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. 256-
235 views DOI Abstract
2018
validation of a process-based agro-ecosystem model (agro-ibis) for maize in xinjiang, northwest china
;Tureniguli Amuti;Geping Luo;Gang Yin;Qi Hu;E. A. Walter-Shea
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 29-
230 views DOI Abstract
View All 46 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.