journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants | Journament

Journal Ranking

#547 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
33.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 57 minutes ago

journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants
Abbreviated Name journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants
ISSN 10496475
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
In-Vitro Evaluation of Anticholinesterase and Antioxidant Activities of Cascuta Reflexa
Akhtar M.
Vol. 25 , pp. 181-191
308 views DOI
2016
arсhaeomineralogy of ancient nonferrous metallurgy pieces of the perm region: experience of usage of electron microprobe analysis
;I. I. Chaykovsky;P. S. Shirinkin
Vol. 4 , No. 33 , pp. 6-17
151 views DOI Abstract
2012
In vitro antioxidant and hepatoprotective effect of the whole plant of Glossocardia bosvallea (L. f.) D. C. against CCl<inf>4</inf>-induced oxidative stress in liver slice culture model
Rajopadhye, A.
Vol. 18 , pp. 274-286
133 views DOI
2014
about the genesis of pumice deposits in the region of tarbagania and pemzovaya mountains in kamchatka
;O M Topchieva;T V Mostovaya;V A Petrovsky
Vol. 3 , No. 24 , pp. 8-18
66 views DOI Abstract
2016
Обоснование достоверности эксплуатационного опробования на шахтных полях Верхнекамского месторождения
;E. O. Bayandina;A. I. Kudryashov;N. K. Kleptsova
Vol. 2 , No. 31 , pp. 72-76
59 views DOI Abstract
2014
formation of microelement composition and hydrogeochemical anomalous zones of ground-water of the kama preurals region
;I. S. Kopylov
Vol. 3 , No. 24 , pp. 30-47
53 views DOI Abstract
2016
Особенности строения и состава коры выветривания на кимберлитовых породах
;N. N. Zinchuk
Vol. 1 , No. 30 , pp. 60-77
31 views DOI Abstract
2015
Уточнение условий формирования сероводородных вод Ферганской впадины по результатам геофизических исследований
;M. R. Zhuraev;Sh. Kh. Abdullaev;P. P. Nagevich;R. A. Tursunmetov
Vol. 1 , No. 26 , pp. 28-37
31 views DOI Abstract
2015
Геотермические условия газонефтеводоносных комплексов Пермско-Башкирского свода в пределах Пермского края
;I. N. Shestov;I. M. Tyurina;A. R. Riyanova
Vol. 2 , No. 27 , pp. 75-84
30 views DOI Abstract
2015
fault tectonics of the svetlinskoye gold deposit (south urals) and its role in ore control
;A Yu Kissin;M E Pritchin
Vol. 3 , No. 28 , pp. 34-42
27 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
33
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.