Data in brief | Journament

Journal Ranking

#116 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
52
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

Data in brief

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name Data Brief
Abbreviated Name data in brief
ISSN 2352-3409
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (180 total)

2019
Trust, life satisfaction and health: Population data in mid-size city in the Global South
Martínez, L.
Vol. 27 , pp. 0-0
566 views DOI
2018
Data on physico-chemical, performance, combustion and emission characteristics of Persea Americana Biodiesel and its blends on direct-injection, compression-ignition engines.
Anawe, P A L;Adewale, Folayan J;
Vol. 21 , pp. 1533-1540
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dataset on assessment of pollution level of selected trace metals in farming area within the proximity of a gold mine dump, Ekuhurleni, South Africa.
Okereafor, Uchenna;Makhatha, Elizabeth;Mekuto, Lukhanyo;Mavumengwana, Vuyo;
Vol. 26 , pp. 104473
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Survey data on organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation in German family firms.
Arz, Christopher;Kuckertz, Andreas;
Vol. 24 , pp. 103827
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnobotanical dataset on local edible fruits in North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Tallei, Trina Ekawati;Pelealu, Johanis Jullian;Pollo, Hard Napoleon;Pollo, Gracia Alice Victoria;Adam, Ahmad Akroman;Effendi, Yunus;Karuniawan, Agung;Rahimah, Souvia;Idroes, Rinaldi;
Vol. 27 , pp. 104681
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multi-period optimal design of an aerospace CFRP waste management supply chain: Data set, variables and criteria for the development of a multi-objective MILP model.
Dong, Anh Vo;Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine;Boix, Marianne;
Vol. 28 , pp. 104766
396 views DOI Abstract
2017
Datasets on abundance of common blossom thrips and weather variables in small-scale avocado orchards at Taita Hills and Mount Kilimanjaro.
Odanga, James J;Mohamed, Samira;Olubayo, Florence;Nyankanga, Richard;Mwalusepo, Sizah;Subramanian, Sevgan;Johansson, Tino;Ekesi, Sunday;
Vol. 15 , pp. 308-313
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Population genetic and phytochemical dataset of : A traditionally important medicinal tree.
Hegde, Satisha;Pai, Sandeep Ramchandra;Bhagwat, Rasika M;Saini, Archana;Rathore, Poonam Kanwar;Jalalpure, Sunil Satyappa;Hegde, Harsha Vasudev;Sugunan, Attayoor Purushottaman;Gupta, Vidya S;Kholkute, Sanjiva D;Roy, Subarna;
Vol. 25 , pp. 104173
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Meta-analysis data for the literature on dividend smoothing.
Fernau, Erik;Hirsch, Stefan;
Vol. 22 , pp. 815-820
384 views DOI Abstract
2018
Structural data of lanthanide complex constructed by 4-iodo-3-methyl benzoic acid and 4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline
Zhao Y.
Vol. 20 , pp. 1928-1934
358 views DOI
View All 180 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
52
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.