south african journal of botany | Journament

Journal Ranking

#540 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

south african journal of botany

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name south african journal of botany
Abbreviated Name south african journal of botany
ISSN 02546299
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (144 total)

2019
Phenolic composition, antioxidant and anticholinesterase properties of the three mushrooms Agaricus silvaticus Schaeff., Hydnum rufescens Pers. and Meripilus giganteus (Pers.) Karst. in Tunisia
Garrab M.
Vol. 124 , pp. 359-363
360 views DOI
2019
Phytochemical constituents from Galanthus alpinus Sosn. var. alpinus and their anticholinesterase activities
Emir C.
Vol. 121 , pp. 63-67
359 views DOI
2011
i. ediciones y técnica filológica. ii. lingüística. iii. literatura y filosofía. iv. historia, religión y sociedad
;Luis Rivero García;José Manuel Díaz de Bustamante;Cecilia Medina López-Lucendo;Dolores Lara;José Antonio Fernández Delgado;Rosario López Gregoris;Aurora López López;Ramón Gutiérrez González
Vol. 79 , No. 1 , pp. 199-223
305 views
2017
Fatty acid composition and antioxidant capacity of cypselas in Centaurea s.l. taxa (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from NE Anatolia
Ayaz F.
Vol. 112 , pp. 474-482
295 views DOI
2019
Quantitative medicinal ethnobotany of Kannaland (western Little Karoo, South Africa): Non-homogeneity amongst villages
Hulley, I.
Vol. 122 , pp. 225-265
282 views DOI
2019
Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents
Karakaya S.
Vol. 121 , pp. 536-542
274 views DOI
2019
Physiological and morphological responses to abiotic stresses in two cultivars of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni
Debnath, M.
Vol. 123 , pp. 124-132
270 views DOI
2018
The effect of frugivorous birds on seed dispersal and germination of the invasive Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) and Indian laurel (Litsea glutinosa)
Dlamini, P.
Vol. 114 , pp. 61-68
268 views DOI
2019
Wild vegetable Rumex acetosa Linn.: Its ethnobotany, pharmacology and phytochemistry – A review
Bello, O.
Vol. 125 , pp. 149-160
257 views DOI
2020
Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on physiological parameters and antioxidant enzymes activities in zea mays L. from a cadmium-contaminated calcareous soil
Shahkolaie, S.
Vol. 128 , pp. 132-140
255 views DOI
View All 144 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.