eating and weight disorders | Journament

Journal Ranking

#189 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
31
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

eating and weight disorders

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name eating and weight disorders
Abbreviated Name eating and weight disorders
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2016
Reply to: Fatih Canan "The relationship between internet addiction and eating disorders"
Alpaslan, A.
Vol. 21 , pp. 139
274 views DOI
2007
a check list of the helminths of guineafowls (numididae) and a host list of these parasites
;K. Junker;J. Boomker
Vol. 74 , No. 4 , pp. 315-337
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) among a sample of overweight/obese French-speaking adolescents
Maïano, C.
Vol. 24 , pp. 575-583
228 views DOI
2013
prevalence of peste des petits ruminants in the arid zone in the republic of niger
;Souaibou Farougou;Mariama Gagara;Guy A. Mensah
Vol. 80 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
228 views DOI Abstract
2009
prospects for controlling trypanosomosis : vector-borne diseases : trypanosomosis
;G.A. Vale
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 41-45
228 views DOI Abstract
2008
value of tests for evaluating udder health in dairy goats: somatic cell counts, california milk cell test and electrical conductivity
;I.M. Petzer;E.F. Donkin;E. Du Preez;J. Karzis;T.J. Van der schans;J.C. Watermeyer;R. Van Reenen
Vol. 75 , No. 4 , pp. 279-287
223 views DOI Abstract
2008
evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the sat serotypes
;M. Cloete;B. Dungu;L.I. Van Staden;N. Ismail-Cassim;W. Vosloo
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 17-31
220 views DOI Abstract
2014
mobile technologies for disease surveillance in humans and animals
;Mpoki Mwabukusi;Esron D. Karimuribo;Mark M. Rweyemamu;Eric Beda
Vol. 81 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e5
212 views DOI Abstract
2011
the diagnosis and prevalence of persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhoea virus in south african feedlot cattle
;Thelma Meiring;Leon Prozesky;Eben R. du Preez;Dirk J. Verwoerd
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
205 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of the infection with the nematode <i>haemonchus contortus</i> (strongylida: trichostrongylidae) on the haematological, biochemical, clinical and reproductive traits in rams
;Mariem Rouatbi;Mohamed Gharbi;Mohamed R. Rjeibi;Imen Ben Salem;Hafidh Akkari;Narjess Lassoued;Mourad Rekik
Vol. 83 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
191 views DOI Abstract
View All 46 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.