motivation and emotion | Journament

Journal Ranking

#125 / 33,867
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

motivation and emotion

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name motivation and emotion
Abbreviated Name motivation and emotion
ISSN 0146-7239
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
The effect of malicious envy on the framing effect: The mediating role of fear of failure
Kang X.
Vol. 43 , pp. 648-661
256 views DOI
2018
Effects of implicit fear of failure on cognitive processing: A diffusion model analysis
Lerche, V.
Vol. 42 , pp. 386-402
252 views DOI
2019
small vessel multi-organ vasculitis and marantic endocarditis complicating rheumatoid arthritis
;Adam Morris;Piyali Pal;Edmond O’Riordan;Dimitrios Poulikakos
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 223-225
232 views DOI
1970
The Role of Autonomy Support and Autonomy Orientation in Prosocial Behavior Engagement - Motivation and Emotion
Gagné, Marylène;Gagné, Marylène;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 199-223
219 views DOI Abstract
2019
Independent and joint effects of teacher enthusiasm and motivation on student motivation and experiences: A field experiment
Frenzel, A.
Vol. 43 , pp. 255-265
194 views DOI
2020
relapse of polymyalgia rheumatica following adjuvanted influenza vaccine: a case-based review
; Margaret F. Bassendine;Simon H. Bridge
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 37-40
187 views DOI
2020
is air pollution affecting the disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? state of the art and a systematic literature review
;Gregory Winston Gilcrease;Dario Padovan;Enrico Heffler;Cristiana Peano;Stefano Massaglia;Dario Roccatello;Massimo Radin;Maria Josè Cuadrado;Savino Sciascia
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 31-34
162 views DOI
2020
granulomatosis with polyangiitis with breast involvement mimicking metastatic cancer: case report and literature review
;Laura Gadeynel;Liesbet Henckaerts;Karolien E. Goffin;Olivier Gheysens;Evelyne Lerut;Tania Roskams;Daniel Blockmans;Giuseppe Floris
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 41-43
158 views DOI
2020
joint scores in hemophilic arthropathy in children: developing country perspectives
;Aritra Guha;Akash Rai;Arnab Nandy;Tanushree Mondal;Narayan Pandit;Sumantra Guha;Dipankar Gupta;Rakesh Mondal
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 26-30
110 views DOI
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.