social cognitive and affective neuroscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#179 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 hours ago

social cognitive and affective neuroscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name soc cogn affect neurosci
Abbreviated Name soc cogn affect neurosci
ISSN 1749-5024
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
Falco, Agnès;Albinet, Cédric;Rattat, Anne-Claire;Paul, Isabelle;Fabre, Eve;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
314 views DOI Abstract
2012
The association between financial hardship and amygdala and hippocampal volumes: results from the PATH through life project.
Butterworth, Peter;Cherbuin, Nicolas;Sachdev, Perminder;Anstey, Kaarin J;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 548-56
282 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion.
Morese, Rosalba;Lamm, Claus;Bosco, Francesca Marina;Valentini, Maria Consuelo;Silani, Giorgia;
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 633-643
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neural substrates for anticipation and consumption of social and monetary incentives in depression.
He, Zhenhong;Zhang, Dandan;Muhlert, Nils;Elliott, Rebecca;
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. 815-826
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame
;Lindsay A. Shaw;Jude Buckley;Paul M. Corballis;Christof Lutteroth;Burkhard C. Wuensche
Vol. 2 , pp. e92-
260 views DOI Abstract
2016
toward physiological indices of emotional state driving future ebook interactivity
;Jan B.F. van Erp;Maarten A. Hogervorst;Ysbrand D. van der Werf
Vol. 2 , pp. e60-
237 views DOI Abstract
2015
Social identity modifies face perception: an ERP study of social categorization.
Derks, Belle;Stedehouder, Jeffrey;Ito, Tiffany A;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 672-9
228 views DOI Abstract
2016
bioassay templates for the semantic web
;Alex M. Clark;Nadia K. Litterman;Janice E. Kranz;Peter Gund;Kellan Gregory;Barry A. Bunin
Vol. 2 , pp. e61-
195 views DOI Abstract
2018
computing the sparse matrix vector product using block-based kernels without zero padding on processors with avx-512 instructions
;Bérenger Bramas;Pavel Kus
Vol. 4 , pp. e151-
179 views DOI Abstract
2015
expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
;Meinald T. Thielsch;Ronja Engel;Gerrit Hirschfeld
Vol. 1 , pp. e19-
177 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
50
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.