the journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#225 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

the journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j clin aesthet dermatol
Abbreviated Name j clin aesthet dermatol
ISSN 1941-2789
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2018
Efficacy of Trifecting Night Cream, a Novel Triple acting Skin Brightening Product: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study.
Jiang, Lily;Hino, Peter D;Bhatia, Ashish;Stephens, Thomas J;Jimenez, Felipe;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 21-25
304 views Abstract
2008
region-based watermarking of biometric images: case study in fingerprint images
;K. Zebbiche;F. Khelifi
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
265 views DOI Abstract
2010
resource allocation with mac layer node cooperation in cognitive radio networks
;Andreas Merentitis;Dionysia Triantafyllopoulou
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
223 views DOI Abstract
2010
near real-time estimation of super-resolved depth and all-in-focus images from a plenoptic camera using graphics processing units
;J. P. Lüke;F. Pérez Nava;J. G. Marichal-Hernández;J. M. Rodríguez-Ramos;F. Rosa
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
198 views DOI Abstract
2009
implementing statistical multiplexing in dvb-h
;Mehdi Rezaei;Imed Bouazizi;Moncef Gabbouj
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
198 views DOI Abstract
2009
advances in video coding for broadcast applications
;Susanna Spinsante;Ennio Gambi;Lorenzo Ciccarelli;Andrea Lorenzo Vitali;Jorge Sastre Martínez;Paul Salama
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
165 views DOI
2011
gaussian pulse-based two-threshold parallel scaling tone reservation for papr reduction of ofdm signals
;Lei Guan;Anding Zhu
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
161 views DOI Abstract
2012
efficient wireless broadcasting through joint network coding and beamforming
;Monchai Lertsutthiwong;Thinh Nguyen;Bechir Hamdaoui
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
156 views DOI Abstract
2010
ip and broadcasting systems convergence
;Georgios Gardikis;George Xilouris;Marie-Jose Montpetit;Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli;Daniel Negru
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
149 views DOI
2010
design of an iptv multicast system for internet backbone networks
;T. H. Szymanski;D. Gilbert
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
146 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.