International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being | Journament

Journal Ranking

#386 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
Abbreviated Name int j qual stud health well-being
ISSN 1748-2631
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (57 total)

2020
To take charge of one's life - group-based education for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care - a lifeworld approach.
Kjellsdotter, Anna;Berglund, Mia;Jebens, Elisabeth;Kvick, Jennie;Andersson, Susanne;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1726856
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social isolation and exclusion: the parents' experience of caring for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders.
Currie, Genevieve;Szabo, Joanna;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1725362
340 views DOI Abstract
2018
A challenging entanglement: health care providers' perspectives on caring for ill and injured tourists on Cozumel Island, Mexico.
Hoffman, Leon;Crooks, Valorie A;Snyder, Jeremy;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1479583
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient pathways as social drama: a qualitative study of cancer trajectories from the patient's perspective.
Hansen, Frank;Berntsen, Gro K Rosvold;Salamonsen, Anita;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1639461
322 views DOI Abstract
2018
Lived experience of infertility among Hong Kong Chinese women.
Tiu, Mimi Mh;Hong, Juliana Yf;Cheng, Vincent S;Kam, Connie Yc;Ng, Bernadette Ty;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1554023
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lost in an unknown terrain: a phenomenological contribution to the understanding of existential concerns as experienced by young women in Sweden.
Lundvall, Maria;Lindberg, Elisabeth;Hörberg, Ulrica;Carlsson, Gunilla;Palmér, Lina;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1658843
301 views DOI Abstract
2013
piriápolis: pionera planificación urbana en américa del sur
;Alfredo Palacios Barra
Vol. 16 , No. 28 , pp. -
295 views Abstract
2019
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study.
Trisyani, Yanny;Windsor, Carol;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1563429
289 views DOI Abstract
2014
ciudad de panamá
;Alfredo Palacios Barra
Vol. 17 , No. 29 , pp. -
287 views Abstract
2007
teledetección satelital en la visión territorial y sistemas de protección ambiental urbano-rural (2ª parte)
;Francisco Sacristán Romero
Vol. 10 , No. 15 , pp. -
286 views Abstract
View All 57 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.