Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#23 / 33,622
⭐ Average
Overall Score
53.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Neurol Sci
Abbreviated Name neurol sci
ISSN 1590-3478
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2020
The role of noninvasive brain stimulation for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Xin;Mao, Zhiqi;Yu, Xinguang;
385 views DOI Abstract
2022
The effects and mechanisms of transcranial ultrasound stimulation combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Wang, Yao;Li, Fei;He, Ming-Jun;Chen, Shang-Jie;
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
Research on cognitive and sociocognitive functions in patients with brain tumours: a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the scientific landscape.
Pertz, Milena;Popkirov, Stoyan;Schlegel, Uwe;Thoma, Patrizia;
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Elevated cerebrospinal fluid homocysteine is associated with blood-brain barrier disruption in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.
Wu, Yonghua;Yang, Xu;Li, Xiaogang;Wang, Haining;Wang, Tiancheng;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generation and validation of algorithms to identify subjects with dementia using administrative data.
DiFrancesco, Jacopo C;Pina, Alessandra;Giussani, Giorgia;Cortesi, Laura;Bianchi, Elisa;Cavalieri d'Oro, Luca;Amodio, Emanuele;Nobili, Alessandro;Tremolizzo, Lucio;Isella, Valeria;Appollonio, Ildebrando;Ferrarese, Carlo;Beghi, Ettore;
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dietary pattern in relation to the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.
Samadi, Mehnoosh;Moradi, Shima;Moradinazar, Mehdi;Mostafai, Roghayeh;Pasdar, Yahya;
Vol. 40 , No. 10 , pp. 2031-2043
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hospital and healthcare insurance system record-based epidemiological study of myasthenia gravis in southern and northern China.
Fang, Wei;Li, Yan;Mo, Rong;Wang, Jianjian;Qiu, Li;Ou, Chuangyi;Lin, Zhongqiang;Huang, Zhidong;Feng, Huiyu;He, Xuetao;Wang, Weizhi;Xu, Peipei;Wang, Lihua;Ran, Hao;Liu, Weibin;
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder After Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Iljazi, Afrim;Ashina, Håkan;Al-Khazali, Haidar Muhsen;Lipton, Richard B;Ashina, Messoud;Schytz, Henrik W;Ashina, Sait;
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
CMAP decrement by low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation in different hand muscles of ALS patients.
Zhang, Dong;Zhao, Yuying;Yan, Chuanzhu;Cao, Lili;Li, Wei;
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prognostic factors for long-term improvement from stroke-related aphasia with adequate linguistic rehabilitation.
Nakagawa, Yoshitaka;Sano, Yoko;Funayama, Michitaka;Kato, Masahiro;
273 views DOI Abstract
View All 38 Articles
54
Overall
Average
85
15
30
50
55
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

53.8/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.