journal of pain research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#326 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 21 hours ago

journal of pain research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name j pain res
Abbreviated Name journal of pain research
ISSN 1178-7090
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (91 total)

2018
Efficacy of perineural dexamethasone with ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in elective thoracotomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Y, Mao;YM, Zuo;B, Mei;LJ, Chen;XS, Liu;Z, Zhang;EW, Gu;
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1811-1819
422 views Abstract
2020
Central Sensitization-Related Changes in Brain Function Activity in a Rat Endometriosis-Associated Pain Model.
Zheng, Ping;Jia, Shuangzheng;Guo, Dalong;Chen, Sikai;Zhang, Wen;Cheng, Aoshuang;Xie, Weijie;Sun, Guibo;Leng, Jinhua;Lang, Jinghe;
Vol. 13 , pp. 95-107
403 views DOI Abstract
2011
Diclofenac topical solution compared with oral diclofenac: a pooled safety analysis
SH, Roth;P, Fuller;
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 159-167
399 views Abstract
2016
Effectiveness of the World Health Organization Cancer Pain Relief Guidelines: an integrative review
Cathy L Carlson and
Vol. 9 , pp. 515-534
372 views DOI Abstract
2009
Patient perception of pain care in hospitals in the United States
Gupta, Anita;Daigle, Sarah;Mojica, Jeffrey;al, et;
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 157-164
363 views Abstract
2019
Preoperative ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks reduce the incidence of postmastectomy chronic pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Qian, Bin;Fu, Shiwei;Yao, Yusheng;Lin, Daoyi;Huang, Li;
Vol. 12 , pp. 597-603
349 views DOI Abstract
2015
Migraine: treatments, comorbidities, and quality of life, in the USA
Christopher D Malone;Amrita Bhowmick;Amy B Wachholtz and
Vol. 8 , pp. 537-547
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serratus anterior plane block or thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched study.
Wang, Liping;Wang, Yu;Zhang, Xi;Zhu, Xidong;Wang, Guonian;
Vol. 12 , pp. 2231-2238
340 views DOI Abstract
2013
The use of metformin is associated with decreased lumbar radiculopathy pain
A, Taylor;AH, Westveld;M, Szkudlinska;P, Guruguri;E, Annabi;A, Patwardhan;TJ, Price;HN, Yassine;
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 755-763
325 views Abstract
2019
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Pregabalin For The Treatment Of Patients With Chronic Cervical Pain With A Neuropathic Component In Japan.
Akazawa, Manabu;Igarashi, Ataru;Ebata, Nozomi;Murata, Tatsunori;Zeniya, Shigeki;Haga, Yuri;Nozawa, Kazutaka;Fujii, Koichi;Taguchi, Toshihiko;
Vol. 12 , pp. 2785-2797
319 views DOI Abstract
View All 91 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.