Frontiers in psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8 / 33,809
⭐ Average
Overall Score
54.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
45
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

Frontiers in psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim soc
Short Name Front Psychol
Abbreviated Name fronpsych
ISSN 1664-1078
Aim and Scope
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#
Author Instructions https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#about
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 09, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (509 total)

2019
Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Personalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1522
646 views DOI Abstract
2018
Leaders’ Gender, Perceived Abusive Supervision and Health
Vol. 9 , pp. -
566 views Abstract
2019
The Impact of Self-Relevance on Preschool Children's Sharing.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1028
543 views DOI Abstract
Corrigendum: Spiritual Leadership on Proactive Workplace Behavior: The Role of Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety.
Vol. 10 , pp. 2056
508 views DOI Abstract
2019
Young, Bullying, and Connected. Common Pathways to Cyberbullying and Problematic Internet Use in Adolescence.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1467
503 views DOI Abstract
2019
Looking for Age Differences in Self-Driving Vehicles: Examining the Effects of Automation Reliability, Driving Risk, and Physical Impairment on Trust.
Vol. 10 , pp. 800
492 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Us Understand Human Creativity.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1401
491 views DOI Abstract
2018
Confronting a Paradox: A New Perspective of the Impact of Uncertainty in Suspense.
Vol. 9 , pp. 1392
476 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Endurance and Contestations of Colonial Constructions of Race Among Malaysians and Singaporeans.
Vol. 10 , pp. 792
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Background Structure of Entrepreneurial Team and Strategic Investment Decisions: A Collective Psychological Capital Perspective.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1416
455 views DOI Abstract
54
Overall
Average
45
60
30
70
38
75
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

54.4/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

44.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.