nature reviews gastroenterology & hepatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#254 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 18 heures

nature reviews gastroenterology & hepatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
ncbi ulakbim sci
Nom Abrégé nat rev gastroenterol hepatol
Nom Abrégé nat rev gastroenterol hepatol
ISSN 1759-5053
Objectifs et Portée
URL
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (101 total)

2017
nk cell alloreactivity against kir-ligand-mismatched hla-haploidentical tissue derived from hla haplotype-homozygous ipscs
;Hiroshi Ichise;Seiji Nagano;Takuya Maeda;Masaki Miyazaki;Yuki Miyazaki;Hiroto Kojima;Nobuyo Yawata;Makoto Yawata;Hidenori Tanaka;Hiroh Saji;Kyoko Masuda;Hiroshi Kawamoto
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 853-867
620 views DOI Abstract
2018
loss of myod and myf5 in skeletal muscle stem cells results in altered myogenic programming and failed regeneration
;Masakazu Yamamoto;Nicholas P. Legendre;Arpita A. Biswas;Alexander Lawton;Shoko Yamamoto;Shahragim Tajbakhsh;Gabrielle Kardon;David J. Goldhamer
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 956-969
350 views Abstract
2019
Artificial intelligence - upping the game in gastrointestinal endoscopy?
Rees, Colin J;Koo, Sara;
289 views DOI
2014
upregulation of cd11a on hematopoietic stem cells denotes the loss of long-term reconstitution potential
;John W. Fathman;Nathaniel B. Fernhoff;Jun Seita;Connie Chao;Vanessa M. Scarfone;Irving L. Weissman;Matthew A. Inlay
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 707-715
287 views DOI Abstract
2017
cd54-mediated interaction with pro-inflammatory macrophages increases the immunosuppressive function of human mesenchymal stromal cells
;Nicolas Espagnolle;Adélie Balguerie;Emmanuelle Arnaud;Luc Sensebé;Audrey Varin
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 961-976
286 views Abstract
2019
A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management.
Yang, Ju Dong;Hainaut, Pierre;Gores, Gregory J;Amadou, Amina;Plymoth, Amelie;Roberts, Lewis R;
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
isogenic fus-egfp ipsc reporter lines enable quantification of fus stress granule pathology that is rescued by drugs inducing autophagy
;Lara Marrone;Ina Poser;Ian Casci;Julia Japtok;Peter Reinhardt;Antje Janosch;Cordula Andree;Hyun O. Lee;Claudia Moebius;Ellen Koerner;Lydia Reinhardt;Maria Elena Cicardi;Karl Hackmann;Barbara Klink;Angelo Poletti;Simon Alberti;Marc Bickle;Andreas Hermann;Udai Bhan Pandey;Anthony A. Hyman;Jared L. Sterneckert
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 375-389
257 views Abstract
2017
vitamin c-induced epigenetic modifications in donor nscs establish midbrain marker expressions critical for cell-based therapy in parkinson's disease
;Noviana Wulansari;Eun-Hee Kim;Yanuar Alan Sulistio;Yong-Hee Rhee;Jae-Jin Song;Sang-Hun Lee
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 1192-1206
251 views DOI Abstract
2016
activation of glp-1 receptor promotes bone marrow stromal cell osteogenic differentiation through β-catenin
;Jingru Meng;Xue Ma;Ning Wang;Min Jia;Long Bi;Yunying Wang;Mingkai Li;Huinan Zhang;Xiaoyan Xue;Zheng Hou;Ying Zhou;Zhibin Yu;Gonghao He;Xiaoxing Luo
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 633-
242 views DOI
2016
Alcohol: taking a population perspective.
Gilmore, William;Chikritzhs, Tanya;Stockwell, Tim;Jernigan, David;Naimi, Timothy;Gilmore, Ian;
Vol. 13 , No. 7 , pp. 426-34
238 views DOI Abstract
View All 101 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.