Journal of medical systems | Journament

Journal Ranking

#153 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 7 hours ago

Journal of medical systems

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Med Syst
Abbreviated Name j med syst
ISSN 1573-689X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (134 total)

2019
Based Medical Systems for Patient's Authentication: Towards a New Verification Secure Framework Using CIA Standard.
Mohsin, A H;Zaidan, A A;Zaidan, B B;Albahri, O S;Albahri, A S;Alsalem, M A;Mohammed, K I;
Vol. 43 , No. 7 , pp. 192
512 views DOI Abstract
2020
Design of a Secure Medical Data Sharing Scheme Based on Blockchain.
Cheng, Xu;Chen, Fulong;Xie, Dong;Sun, Hui;Huang, Cheng;
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 52
469 views DOI Abstract
2020
Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.
Bhuyan, Soumitra Sudip;Kabir, Umar Y;Escareno, Jessica M;Ector, Kenya;Palakodeti, Sandeep;Wyant, David;Kumar, Sajeesh;Levy, Marian;Kedia, Satish;Dasgupta, Dipankar;Dobalian, Aram;
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 98
405 views DOI Abstract
2016
A Novel Framework for Medical Web Information Foraging Using Hybrid ACO and Tabu Search.
Drias, Yassine;Kechid, Samir;Pasi, Gabriella;
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 5
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Systematic Review for Enabling of Develop a Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Application: Taxonomy, Substantially Analysis, Motivations, Challenges, Recommendations and Future Direction.
Hussien, H M;Yasin, S M;Udzir, S N I;Zaidan, A A;Zaidan, B B;
Vol. 43 , No. 10 , pp. 320
345 views DOI Abstract
2018
Healthcare Blockchain System Using Smart Contracts for Secure Automated Remote Patient Monitoring.
Griggs, Kristen N;Ossipova, Olya;Kohlios, Christopher P;Baccarini, Alessandro N;Howson, Emily A;Hayajneh, Thaier;
Vol. 42 , No. 7 , pp. 130
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Profile of Educational Technology Use by Medical Students and Evaluation of a New Mobile Application Designed for the Study of Human Physiology.
Oliveira, Erica Y;Crosewski, Nathalia I;Silva, André L M;Ribeiro, Cibele T D;de Oliveira, Camila M;Fogaça, Rosalvo T H;Dias, Fernando A L;
Vol. 43 , No. 10 , pp. 313
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analysing the Scientific Publications of Peter Reichertz: Reflections from the Perspective of Medical Informatics Knowledge Today.
Haux, Reinhold;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 23
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders' Perceptions.
Alonso, Vera;Santos, João Vasco;Pinto, Marta;Ferreira, Joana;Lema, Isabel;Lopes, Fernando;Freitas, Alberto;
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 62
333 views DOI Abstract
2016
Bee Swarm Optimization for Medical Web Information Foraging.
Drias, Yassine;Kechid, Samir;Pasi, Gabriella;
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 40
316 views DOI Abstract
View All 134 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.