sustainable materials and technologies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#415 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

sustainable materials and technologies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name sustainable materials and technologies
Abbreviated Name sustainable materials and technologies
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2013
fish and amphibians as potential reservoirs of mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of buruli ulcer disease
;Mark Eric Benbow;David M. Malakauskas;Michael G. Kaufman;Sarah J. Willson;Richard W. Merritt;Heather R. Williamson
Vol. 3 , pp. 1-13
481 views DOI Abstract
2016
seroprevalence of rift valley fever virus in sheep and goats in zambézia, mozambique
;Anne-Lie Blomström;Isabelle Scharin;Hedvig Stenberg;Jaquline Figueiredo;Ofélia Nhambirre;Ana Abilio;Mikael Berg;José Fafetine
Vol. 6 , pp. 1-4
402 views DOI Abstract
2016
campylobacter growth rates in four different matrices: broiler caecal material, live birds, bolton broth, and brain heart infusion broth
;Tara Battersby;Desmond Walsh;Paul Whyte;Declan J. Bolton
Vol. 6 , pp. 1-6
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gold nanoparticle based photothermal therapy: Development and application for effective cancer treatment
Yang W.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2015
serologic screening for 13 infectious agents in roe deer (capreolus capreolus) in flanders
;Paul Tavernier;Stanislas U. Sys;Kris De Clercq;Ilse De Leeuw;Anne Brigitte Caij;Miet De Baere;Nick De Regge;David Fretin;Virginie Roupie;Marc Govaerts;Paul Heyman;Daisy Vanrompay;Lizi Yin;Isabelle Kalmar;Vanessa Suin;Bernard Brochier;Alexandre Dobly;Stéphane De Craeye;Sophie Roelandt;Els Goossens;Stefan Roels
Vol. 5 , pp. 1-12
310 views DOI Abstract
2012
threats from emerging and re-emerging neglected tropical diseases (ntds)
;Tim K. Mackey;Bryan A. Liang
Vol. 2 , pp. 1-7
289 views DOI Abstract
2014
level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°c or 70°c followed by tumble drying
;Eva Tano;Åsa Melhus
Vol. 4 , pp. 1-7
271 views DOI Abstract
2016
one health capacity building in sub-saharan africa
;Innocent B. Rwego;Olutayo Olajide Babalobi;Protus Musotsi;Serge Nzietchueng;Christian Keambo Tiambo;John David Kabasa;Irene Naigaga;Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka;Katherine Pelican
Vol. 6 , pp. 1-9
264 views DOI Abstract
2014
a need for one health approach – lessons learned from outbreaks of rift valley fever in saudi arabia and sudan
;Osama Ahmed Hassan;Clas Ahlm;Magnus Evander
Vol. 4 , pp. 1-8
251 views DOI Abstract
2019
status of aflatoxin contamination in cow milk produced in smallholder dairy farms in urban and peri-urban areas of nairobi county: a case study of kasarani sub county, kenya
;Irene Kagera;Peter Kahenya;Florence Mutua;Gladys Anyango;Florence Kyallo;Delia Grace;Johanna Lindahl
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.