Journal of Baltalimanı | Journament

Journal Ranking

#128 / 33,727
📉 Poor
Overall Score
30.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
0
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
42
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

Journal of Baltalimanı

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name JoB
Abbreviated Name JoB
ISSN 3108-4591
Aim and Scope Journal of Baltalimanı (JoB) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, and case reports in the field of health sciences.
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/job
Author Instructions https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/job/writing-rules

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (6 total)

2025
Baltalimanı: A Historical Beacon and Academic Pioneer in Turkish Orthopedics
Bülent Karslioğlu;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 31-32
7 views DOI
2025
Glove Perforation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Silent Culprit of Infection
Ahmet Keskin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
1 views Abstract
2025
Promoting Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Children
İlke Karabıyık Demir
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 15-19
1 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Relationship Between Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review
Kubra Aydin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 20-30
1 views DOI Abstract
2025
Surgical Waiting Times in Turkish Public Hospitals: A Conceptual Framework for an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mobile Application
Ufuk Burak Karcıoğlu
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 5-9
DOI Abstract
2025
The Swedish Health System from a Turkish Perspective: Universal Health Coverage and Comparative Analysis
Kalbiye Memiş
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 10-14
DOI Abstract
30
Overall
Poor
0
60
30
42
30
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

0.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.