nanotoxicology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#488 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

nanotoxicology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name nanotoxicology
Abbreviated Name nanotoxicology
ISSN 1743-5404
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (102 total)

2019
An integrated approach to determine interactive genotoxic and global gene expression effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) on marine mussels: evidence of reverse 'Trojan Horse' effects.
Barranger, Audrey;Rance, Graham A;Aminot, Yann;Dallas, Lorna J;Sforzini, Susanna;Weston, Nicola J;Lodge, Rhys W;Banni, Mohamed;Arlt, Volker M;Moore, Michael N;Readman, James W;Viarengo, Aldo;Khlobystov, Andrei N;Jha, Awadhesh N;
, pp. 1-20
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonselective Uptake of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles by Wheat.
Zhang, Wan-Ying;Wang, Qi;Li, Min;Dang, Fei;Zhou, Dong-Mei;
, pp. 1-26
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide particles found in human tissues.
Peters, Ruud J B;Oomen, Agnes G;van Bemmel, Greet;van Vliet, Loes;Undas, Anna K;Munniks, Sandra;Bleys, Ronald L A W;Tromp, Peter C;Brand, Walter;van der Lee, Martijn;
, pp. 1-13
252 views DOI Abstract
2016
monasteries of the serbian orthodox church (soc) on the internet: new forms of religious and spiritual interactions through facebook
;Lidija B. Radulović;Senka Kovač
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
2016
fashion, media and the elite: ethnography of the exploitation of the slovenian transitional media promenade
;Vlado Kotnik
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. -
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
the "cantankerous old people" next door : how old age is represented in serbian television commercials
;Ljubica Milosavljević
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. -
219 views Abstract
2016
anthropology of aids. risk environment and injecting routine. the case of belgrade injecting drug users
;Bojan Žikić
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
219 views Abstract
2016
the legend of the old shoemaker and the metro customer card
;Ivan Kovačević
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. -
213 views Abstract
2016
football and film: „the coach“ (trener)
;Ivan Kovačević
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. -
211 views Abstract
2016
if only derrida missed that flight... about the assessment of the "academic achievements" of the so-called "american anthropology" by belgrade structural-semiotic school of folklore
;Miloš Milenković
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 37-51
206 views Abstract
View All 102 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.