biomaterials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#427 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

biomaterials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name biomaterials
Abbreviated Name biomaterials
ISSN 1878-5905
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (94 total)

2016
Balancing stealth and echogenic properties in an ultrasound contrast agent with drug delivery potential.
Jablonowski, Lauren J;Alfego, David;Andorko, James I;Eisenbrey, John R;Teraphongphom, Nutte;Wheatley, Margaret A;
Vol. 103 , pp. 197-206
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Silver nanoparticle-adjuvanted vaccine protects against lethal influenza infection through inducing BALT and IgA-mediated mucosal immunity.
Sanchez-Guzman, Daniel;Le Guen, Pierre;Villeret, Berengere;Sola, Nuria;Le Borgne, Remi;Guyard, Alice;Kemmel, Alix;Crestani, Bruno;Sallenave, Jean-Michel;Garcia-Verdugo, Ignacio;
Vol. 217 , pp. 119308
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bioactive glasses meet phytotherapeutics: The potential of natural herbal medicines to extend the functionality of bioactive glasses.
Schuhladen, Katharina;Roether, Judith A;Boccaccini, Aldo R;
Vol. 217 , pp. 119288
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anti-oxidant activity reinforced reduced graphene oxide/alginate microgels: Mesenchymal stem cell encapsulation and regeneration of infarcted hearts.
Choe, Goeun;Kim, Seon-Wook;Park, Junggeon;Park, Junha;Kim, Semin;Kim, Yong Sook;Ahn, Youngkeun;Jung, Da-Woon;Williams, Darren R;Lee, Jae Young;
Vol. 225 , pp. 119513
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Developing mechanically robust, triazole-zwitterionic hydrogels to mitigate foreign body response (FBR) for islet encapsulation
Liu, Q.
Vol. 230 , pp. 0-0
318 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to: “Central metal-derived co-assembly of biomimetic GdTPP/ZnTPP porphyrin nanocomposites for enhanced dual-modal imaging-guided photodynamic therapy” [Biomaterials 229 (2020) 119576](S0142961219306751)(10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119576)
Wang, J.
Vol. 235 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2019
Collagen microencapsulation recapitulates mesenchymal condensation and potentiates chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells – A matrix-driven in vitro model of early skeletogenesis
Li, Y.
Vol. 213 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2019
Remote and reversible control of in vivo bacteria clustering by NIR-driven multivalent upconverting nanosystems.
Li, Wei;Dong, Kai;Wang, Huan;Zhang, Peng;Sang, Yanjuan;Ren, Jinsong;Qu, Xiaogang;
Vol. 217 , pp. 119310
296 views DOI Abstract
2003
análise do gerenciamento dos resíduos sólidos dos serviços de saúde em curitiba, com ênfase no tratamento e destino final, e implicações socioambientais
;Maria Inez Antonia Pelacani SPINA
Vol. 7 , pp. -
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Extracellular matrix-penetrating nanodrill micelles for liver fibrosis therapy.
Fan, Qian-Qian;Zhang, Cheng-Lu;Qiao, Jian-Bin;Cui, Peng-Fei;Xing, Lei;Oh, Yu-Kyoung;Jiang, Hu-Lin;
Vol. 230 , pp. 119616
272 views DOI Abstract
View All 94 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.