conference proceedings : annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society ieee engineering in medicine and biology society annual conference | Journament

Journal Ranking

#173 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

conference proceedings : annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society ieee engineering in medicine and biology society annual conference

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name conf proc ieee eng med biol soc
Abbreviated Name conf proc ieee eng med biol soc
ISSN 1557-170X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (127 total)

2019
Improving Accessibility for People with Disabilities: A Case Study on Inclusive Beach Tourism.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 1302-1305
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Single-trial Connectivity Estimation through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 6422-6425
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes for Improved Early Prediction of Septic Shock in the ICU.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 6103-6108
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Instrumented Measurement Scheme for the Assessment of Upper Limb Function in Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 317-320
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Mobile Cloud based IoMT Framework for Automated Health Assessment and Management.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 6517-6520
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gait Analysis Using Stereo Camera in Daily Environment.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 1471-1475
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Smart Phone based Snoring Sound analysis to Identify Upper Airway Obstructions.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4233-4236
342 views DOI Abstract
2012
seasonal flight, optimal timing and efficacy of selected insecticides for cabbage maggot (delia radicum l., diptera: anthomyiidae) control
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 1001-1027
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Real-Time Cognitive Workload Monitoring Based on Machine Learning Using Physiological Signals in Rescue Missions.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 3779-3785
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
A New Fracture Liaison Service Using the Mobile Application and IoT Sensor.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 3486-3489
311 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.