inorganica chimica acta | Journament

Journal Ranking

#375 / 33,809
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 5 horas

inorganica chimica acta

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus ulakbim
Nome Abreviado inorganica chimica acta
Nome Abreviado inorganica chimica acta
ISSN 00201693
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (100 total)

2019
Heteroleptic complexes of silver(I) featuring 4′-hydroxy- and 4′-(2-furyl)-2, 2′:6′ 2″-terpyridine: An easy route for synthesis of silver nanoparticles
Momeni B.
Vol. 487 , pp. 145-152
388 views DOI
2019
Aromatic aldehyde based chemosensors for fluoride and cyanide detection in organic and aqueous media: Ascertained by characterization, spectroscopic and DFT studies
Kodlady S.
Vol. 494 , pp. 245-255
372 views DOI
2018
Copper (I) complex of 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline: Synthesis, structure, and catalytic properties
Amini M.
Vol. 482 , pp. 333-339
358 views DOI
2019
A dual approach to study the synthesis, crystal structure and nonlinear optical properties of binuclear Pd(II) complex of 3-methyl-5-(trifluoromethyl) pyrazole and its potential quantum chemical analogues
Muhammad, S.
Vol. 494 , pp. 160-167
354 views DOI
2019
The synthesis of di-orthometallated triphenyl phosphite iridium(III) complexes with steric groups and their application in OLEDs
Mei Q.
Vol. 495 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2019
Synthesis of coumarin derivatives and its Ru(II) complexes encompassing pyrazole ring as a potent antidiabetic agents – A biochemical perspective
Umadevi, M.
Vol. 492 , pp. 48-59
322 views DOI
2019
Synthesis, characterization and photophysical properties of cyclotriphosphazenes including heterocyclic rings
İbişoğlu, H.
Vol. 498 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2020
Ruthenium(II) complexes of pyridine-carboxamide ligands bearing appended benzothiazole/benzimidazole rings: Structural diversity and catalysis
Vijayan, P.
Vol. 502 , pp. 0-0
291 views DOI
1992
Copper(I) complexes with tri-o-tolylphosphine and heterocyclic thione ligands. Crystal structures of [(pyrimidine-2-thione)(tri-o-tolylphosphine)copper(I) chloride] and [(pyridine-2-thione)(tri-o-tolylphosphine)copper(I) iodide]
Hadjikakou, S.K.;Aslanidis, P.;Karagiannidis, P.;Aubry, A.;Skoulika, S.;
Vol. 193 , No. 2 , pp. 129-135
281 views DOI
2018
Synthesis, spectroscopy, electrochemistry and DNA interactive studies of meso-tetra(1-naphthyl)porphyrin and its metal complexes
Hahn, da Silveira C.
Vol. 482 , pp. 542-553
264 views DOI
View All 100 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.