zdravstveno varstvo | Journament

Journal Ranking

#347 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

zdravstveno varstvo

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name zdr varst
Abbreviated Name zdr varst
ISSN 0351-0026
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (94 total)

2007
prevalence of usa300 colonization or infection and associated variables during an outbreak of community-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in a marginalized urban population
;Mark Gilbert;Judy MacDonald;Marie Louie;Dan Gregson;Kunyan Zhang;Sameer Elsayed;Kevin Laupland;Diane Nielsen;Virginia Wheeler;Tara Lye;John Conly
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 357-362
441 views DOI Abstract
2012
prion disease risk perception in canadian medical laboratories
;Jane A Buxton;Bonnie Henry;Aiza Waheed;Alexis Crabtree
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. e31-e35
368 views DOI Abstract
2017
first insight into a nationwide genotypic diversity of mycobacterium tuberculosis among previously treated pulmonary tuberculosis cases in benin, west africa
;Dissou Affolabi;N’Dira Sanoussi;Sergio Codo;Fréderic Sogbo;Prudence Wachinou;Faridath Massou;Aderemi Kehinde;Séverin Anagonou
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
327 views DOI Abstract
2007
safety and immunogenicity of a fully liquid vaccine containing five-component pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus-inactivated poliomyelitis-haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines administered at two, four, six and 18 months of age
;Ronald Gold;Luis Barreto;Santiago Ferro;John Thippawong;Roland Guasparini;William Meekison;Margaret Russell;Elaine Mills;Dana Harrison;Pierre Lavigne
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 241-248
311 views DOI Abstract
2018
screening for diabetes mellitus among tuberculosis patients: findings from a study at a tertiary hospital in lusaka, zambia
;Sombo Fwoloshi;Lottie M. Hachaambwa;Kaseya O. Chiyeñu;Lameck Chirwa;Thijs W. Hoffman;Owen Ngalamika;Sarah Lou Bailey
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
292 views DOI Abstract
2013
antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use associated with laboratory-confirmed cases of campylobacter infection in two health units in ontario
;Anne E Deckert;Richard J Reid-Smith;Susan E Tamblyn;Larry Morrell;Patrick Seliske;Frances B Jamieson;Rebecca Irwin;Catherine E Dewey;Patrick Boerlin;Scott A McEwen
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. e16-e21
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
identification of raoultella terrigena as a rare causative agent of subungual abscess based on 16s rrna and housekeeping gene sequencing
;Yu Wang;Xiawei Jiang;Zemin Xu;Chaoqun Ying;Wei Yu;Yonghong Xiao
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
241 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring Quality in Primary Healthcare - Opportunities and Weaknesses.
Arvidsson, Eva;Dijkstra, Rob;Klemenc-Ketiš, Zalika;
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 101-103
238 views DOI Abstract
2010
strategies for the use of oseltamivir and zanamivir during pandemic outbreaks
;Elsa Hansen;Troy Day;Julien Arino;Jianhong Wu;Seyed M Moghadas
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. e28-e63
229 views DOI Abstract
2016
Health care reforms.
Marušič, Dorjan;Prevolnik Rupel, Valentina;
Vol. 55 , No. 3 , pp. 225-227
223 views Abstract
View All 94 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.