Urology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#457 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

Urology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Urology
Abbreviated Name urology
ISSN 1527-9995
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2019
Acute Renal Transplant Failure Secondary to an Obstructing Ileal Conduit Adenocarcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.
Huelster, Heather L;Hogan, Melissa M S;Resnick, Matthew J;
336 views DOI
2019
The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.
Filippou, Pauline;Mahajan, Sejal;Deal, Allison;Wallen, Eric M;Tan, Hung-Jui;Pruthi, Raj S;Smith, Angela B;
326 views DOI Abstract
2018
Geographic Variation in Cystoscopy Rates for Suspected Bladder Cancer between Female and Male Medicare Beneficiaries.
Han, David S;Zhou, Weiping;Seigne, John D;Lynch, Kristine E;Schroeck, Florian R;
Vol. 122 , pp. 83-88
316 views DOI Abstract
2020
Female Authorship Publishing Trends and Forecasting in Pediatric Urology: Are we Closer to Gender Equality?
Rickard, Mandy;Hannick, Jessica H;Blais, Anne-Sophie;Wang, Jishen;Santos, Joana Dos;Lorenzo, Armando J;
290 views DOI Abstract
1998
Immunohistochemical localization of nephrocalcin, a kidney-specific glycoprotein, to renal cell carcinoma.
Michaels, E K;Ghosh, L;Nakagawa, Y;Netzer, M F;Vidal, P;Arsenault, D;Ito, H;
Vol. 52 , No. 5 , pp. 920-4
283 views Abstract
2019
Urinary diversion disparity following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the Hispanic population.
Rios, Emily M;Parma, Mitchell A;Fernandez, Roman A;Clinton, Timothy N;Reyes, Ryan M;Kaushik, Dharam;Pruthi, Deepak;Mansour, Ahmed M;Mukherjee, Neelam;Gelfond, Jon;Wheeler, Karen M;Svatek, Robert S;
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
A prospective comparative study of the feasibility and reliability of telephone follow-up in female urology: the Patient Home Office Novel Evaluation (PHONE) Study.
Balzarro, Matteo;Rubilotta, Emanuele;Trabacchin, Nicolò;Mancini, Vito;Costantini, Elisabetta;Artibani, Walter;Antonelli, Alessandro;
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnostic performance of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men.
Henning, Grant M;Vetter, Joel M;Drake, Bettina F;Ippolito, Joseph E;Shetty, Anup S;Andriole, Gerald L;Kim, Eric H;
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Safety and Short-term Outcomes of Leukocyte Depleted Autologous Transfusions During Radical Cystectomy
Myrga, J.
Vol. 135 , pp. 106-110
245 views DOI
2020
Letter-to-the-Editor: Re: Boydston K, Terry R, Winship B, Davis L, Yttri S, Carlos E, Scales C, Lipkin M, Preminger GM. The impact of alternative alkalinizing agents on 24-hour urine parameters. Urology 2020 Apr 21;S0090-4295(20)30428-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.047.
Goel, Apul;
237 views DOI
View All 23 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.