materials research bulletin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#112 / 33,729
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 months ago

materials research bulletin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name materials research bulletin
Abbreviated Name materials research bulletin
ISSN 00255408
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (303 total)

2012
technical note: downscaling rcm precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations – a comparison of methods
;J. E. Haugen;T. Engen-Skaugen;J. B. Bremnes;L. Gudmundsson
Vol. 16 , No. 9 , pp. 3383-3390
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Photocatalytic potential of bio-engineered copper nanoparticles synthesized from Ficus carica extract for the degradation of toxic organic dye from waste water: Growth mechanism and study of parameter affecting the degradation performance
Usman, M.
Vol. 120 , pp. 0-0
296 views DOI
2013
legitimising data-driven models: exemplification of a new data-driven mechanistic modelling framework
;N. J. Mount;C. W. Dawson;R. J. Abrahart
Vol. 17 , No. 7 , pp. 2827-2843
276 views DOI Abstract
2016
carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
;M. M. R. Jahangir;K. G. Richards;M. G. Healy;L. Gill;C. Müller;P. Johnston;O. Fenton
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 109-123
257 views DOI Abstract
2012
assessing water reservoirs management and development in northern vietnam
;A. Castelletti;F. Pianosi;X. Quach;R. Soncini-Sessa
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 189-199
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, structural characterization and electrical conduction mechanism of the new organic–inorganic complex: ([(C<inf>3</inf>H<inf>7</inf>)<inf>4</inf>N]FeCl<inf>4</inf>)
Ben Brahim K.
Vol. 118 , pp. 0-0
255 views DOI
2017
impacts of future deforestation and climate change on the hydrology of the amazon basin: a multi-model analysis with a new set of land-cover change scenarios
;M. Guimberteau;P. Ciais;A. Ducharne;J. P. Boisier;A. P. Dutra Aguiar;H. Biemans;H. De Deurwaerder;D. Galbraith;B. Kruijt;F. Langerwisch;G. Poveda;A. Rammig;D. A. Rodriguez;G. Tejada;K. Thonicke;C. Von Randow;R. C. S. Von Randow;K. Zhang;H. Verbeeck
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 1455-1475
255 views DOI Abstract
2004
regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the nordic and baltic regions
;N. Vagstad;N. Vagstad;P. Stålnacke;P. Stålnacke;H.-E. Andersen;H.-E. Andersen;J. Deelstra;J. Deelstra;V. Jansons;V. Jansons;K. Kyllmar;K. Kyllmar;E. Loigu;E. Loigu;S. Rekolainen;S. Rekolainen;R. Tumas;R. Tumas
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 651-662
254 views Abstract
2013
derivation of critical rainfall thresholds for shallow landslides as a tool for debris flow early warning systems
;M. N. Papa;V. Medina;F. Ciervo;A. Bateman
Vol. 17 , No. 10 , pp. 4095-4107
250 views DOI Abstract
2013
a global water scarcity assessment under shared socio-economic pathways &ndash; part 1: water use
;N. Hanasaki;S. Fujimori;T. Yamamoto;S. Yoshikawa;Y. Masaki;Y. Hijioka;M. Kainuma;Y. Kanamori;T. Masui;K. Takahashi;S. Kanae
Vol. 17 , No. 7 , pp. 2375-2391
249 views DOI Abstract
View All 303 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.