construction and building materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#55 / 33,729
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
48.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 months ago

construction and building materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name construction and building materials
Abbreviated Name construction and building materials
ISSN 09500618
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (251 total)

2013
characterization and modeling of cds/cdte heterojunction thin-film solar cell for high efficiency performance
;Hamid Fardi;Fatima Buny
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis and construction of a highly potent hybrid organic/inorganic anti-corrosive pigment for effective corrosion control of mild steel in simulated seawater
Ralkhal S.
Vol. 222 , pp. 400-413
312 views DOI
2020
Durability assessment of reinforced concrete structures considering global warming: A performance-based engineering and experimental approach
Guo, H.
Vol. 233 , pp. 0-0
299 views DOI
2020
Effect of particle size, porous structure and content of rice husk ash on the hydration process and compressive strength evolution of concrete
Vieira, A.
Vol. 236 , pp. 0-0
297 views DOI
2019
Influence of seawater aging on mechanical properties of nano-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> embedded glass fiber reinforced polymer nanocomposites
Nayak, R.
Vol. 221 , pp. 12-19
273 views DOI
2012
organic pollutants removal from petroleum refinery wastewater with nanotitania photocatalyst and uv light emission
;Javad Saien;Fatemeh Shahrezaei
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
270 views DOI Abstract
2020
Compressive behavior of UHPC confined by both spiral stirrups and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP)
Chang, W.
Vol. 230 , pp. 0-0
261 views DOI
2012
nanophotonics for molecular diagnostics and therapy applications
;João Conde;João Rosa;João C. Lima;Pedro V. Baptista
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hygrothermal conditioning of wet-layup CFRP-concrete adhesive joints modified with silane coupling agent and core-shell rubber nanoparticles
Morshed, S.
Vol. 227 , pp. 0-0
256 views DOI
2019
Thermal transfer behavior of biochar-natural inorganic clay composite for building envelope insulation
Lee, H.
Vol. 223 , pp. 668-678
248 views DOI
View All 251 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
86
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.