Frontiers in human neuroscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#499 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 hours ago

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Front Hum Neurosci
Abbreviated Name front hum neurosci
ISSN 1662-5161
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (106 total)

2018
Prefrontal Cortex Oxygenation Evoked by Convergence Load Under Conflicting Stimulus-to-Accommodation and Stimulus-to-Vergence Eye-Movements Measured by NIRS
Richter, Hans O.;Forsman, M.;Elcadi, G. H.;Brautaset, R.;Marsh, John E.;Marsh, John E.;Zetterberg, C.;Zetterberg, C.;
Vol. 12 , pp. -
728 views Abstract
2013
Cyborg psychiatry to ensure agency and autonomy in mental disorders. A proposal for neuromodulation therapeutics.
Franchi, Jean-Arthur eMicoulaud;Franchi, Jean-Arthur eMicoulaud;eFond, Guillaume;eDumas, Guillaume;
Vol. 7 , pp. -
423 views Abstract
2013
Multisensory integration in non-human primates during a sensory-motor task
eLanz, Florian;eMoret, Véronique;Rouiller, Eric Michel;eLoquet, Gérard;
Vol. 7 , pp. -
405 views Abstract
2013
Exploring sarcasm detection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using ecologically valid measures.
Staios, Mathew;Fisher, Fiona;Lindell, Annukka K;Ong, Ben;Howe, Jim;Reardon, Katrina;
Vol. 7 , pp. 178
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates the Effect of Unreasonable Request in the Context of Peer Punishment.
Pan, Jingjing;Zhu, Chengkang;Liu, Xiaoli;Wang, Yiwen;Li, Jianbiao;
Vol. 13 , pp. 255
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neural Correlates of Preference: A Transmodal Validation Study.
Akiba, Henrique T;Costa, Marcelo F;Gomes, July S;Oda, Eduardo;Simurro, Paula B;Dias, Alvaro M;
Vol. 13 , pp. 73
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
Perceived Intensity and Discrimination Ability for Lingual Electrotactile Stimulation Depends on Location and Orientation of Electrodes
Stone-Roy, Leslie M.;Jr., Joel Moritz;Turk, Philip;Williams, John D.;
Vol. 11 , pp. -
353 views Abstract
2019
Current Status of Neurofeedback for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and the Possibility of Decoded Neurofeedback.
Chiba, Toshinori;Kanazawa, Tetsufumi;Koizumi, Ai;Ide, Kentarou;Taschereau-Dumouchel, Vincent;Boku, Shuken;Hishimoto, Akitoyo;Shirakawa, Miyako;Sora, Ichiro;Lau, Hakwan;Yoneda, Hiroshi;Kawato, Mitsuo;
Vol. 13 , pp. 233
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Negative Emotional Stimuli Enhance Conflict Resolution Without Altering Arousal.
Fehring, Daniel J;Samandra, Ranshikha;Rosa, Marcello G;Mansouri, Farshad A;
Vol. 13 , pp. 282
330 views DOI Abstract
2018
Negatively Skewed Locomotor Activity Is Related to Autistic Traits and Behavioral Problems in Typically Developing Children and Those With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Ogino, Kazuo;Takahashi, Hidetoshi;Takahashi, Hidetoshi;Nakamura, Toru;Kim, Jinhyuk;Kikuchi, Hiroe;Nakahachi, Takayuki;Ebishima, Ken;Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro;Ando, Tetsuya;Sumiyoshi, Tomiki;Stickley, Andrew;Stickley, Andrew;Yamamoto, Yoshiharu;Kamio, Yoko;
Vol. 12 , pp. -
325 views Abstract
View All 106 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.