journal of molecular structure | Journament

Journal Ranking

#32 / 33,729
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
49.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
87
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 months ago

journal of molecular structure

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name journal of molecular structure
Abbreviated Name journal of molecular structure
ISSN 00222860
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (248 total)

2008
comparison of interrupted versus continuous closure in abdominal wound repair: a meta-analysis of 23 trials
;Himanshu Gupta;Anurag Srivastava;Geetha R. Menon;Chandra Sekhar Agrawal;Sunil Chumber;Sandeep Kumar
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 104-114
920 views DOI Abstract
2015
laparoscopic management of symptomatic urachal remnants in adulthood
;Sze Li Siow;Hans Alexander Mahendran;Mark Hardin
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 85-90
508 views DOI Abstract
2013
retroperitoneal laparoscopic debridement and drainage of infected retroperitoneal necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis
;Yuliang Tu;Huabo Jiao;Xianglong Tan;Dadong Wang;Jundong Du;Liyuan Sun;Wenzhi Zhang
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 159-164
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
colorectal cancer in malaysia: its burden and implications for a multiethnic country
;Sajesh K. Veettil;Kean Ghee Lim;Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk;Siew Mooi Ching;Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. 481-489
412 views DOI Abstract
2014
Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, DNA interaction and biological activities of Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes with [(1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-ylimino)methyl]naphthalene-2-ol
Gaber M.
Vol. 1076 , pp. 251-261
408 views DOI
2019
Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT studies on molecular structure, vibrational spectra, NMR chemical shifts and NBO analysis of Bis(2-hydroxyethyl(phenyl)carbamodithioate) nickel (II)
Ajayi, T.
Vol. 1197 , pp. 308-317
377 views DOI
2019
Regioselective synthesis of novel antibacterial pyrazole-benzofuran hybrids: 2D NMR spectroscopy studies and molecular docking
Sanad, S.
Vol. 1188 , pp. 214-226
376 views DOI
2018
An eight-coordinate zinc complex containing the highly pre-organized ligand 1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid: Solvothermal synthesis, supramolecular structure and CSD studies
Mirzaei M.
Vol. 1171 , pp. 626-630
374 views DOI
2018
Novel 1,3-diethyl-2-thiobarbiturates of 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline: Synthesis, crystal structure and thermal stability
Golovnev N.
Vol. 1171 , pp. 488-494
369 views DOI
2019
New thiosemicarbazide-1,2,3-triazole hybrids as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation
Bakherad, Z.
Vol. 1192 , pp. 192-200
364 views DOI
View All 248 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
87
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

49.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

86.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.